- Joined
- Nov 23, 2012
- Messages
- 2,372
- Location
- Iceland
Since this site is about dirt bikes and off roading, supporting liberal democrats who typically favor land closures is a betrayal to our sport/hobby.
This is an interesting point to discuss. Just as an exaggerated example, in the hard-right "privatize everything" / "private property rights above all", I see swaths of privately-owned land being closed off to dirt bike riding and no negotiaton angle for us to get in - and conversely, in a strong state-backed public land domain, I see the possibility of shared access to national parks that we can at least discuss getting to ride in.
Edit: Of course "The Market" may give us access to ride, in the thought experiment of "all land is private" - the theory is then that there will be incentive for some landowners to allow riders who pay somehow. So it is then the question: Which do you find more likely, that you have enough money to pay for riding? Or that your vote and influence as a citizen in coalitions of like-minded citizens exercising political influence will open up land for riding?
Edit 2: I know this is a false dichotomy! There's kind of the middle way that land is just public and open and unrestricted. Then that's another thing to consider: Will it stay that way? What forces are there that claim that land? What force is there that keeps the land unclaimed and / or open?
Last edited: