This is a very interesting topic ! It is "common knowledge" that a husaberg, or a husky, or any other competion-oriented 4 stroke mono is not suitable with highway use.
But exactly why ? I find it hard to believe that the components, like conrod, piston, or the crank would be made of inferior material or were poorly engineered. Since 1999 they have a serious oil system, before that time, I can understand why people better not used them on highways...
The cooling system is strong enough to last for 2 x 40 minutes grand prix races, at average speeds of 50 to 55 kilometer/hour. So this is not an ideal situation for receiveing much cooling. And yet the engines support this. It is true that the total amount of oil is limited. But when you change it every 300 km, is this really a problem ?
The transmission : yes, the engines and also the transmission were designed for off road use, not for maximum grip on tarmac with 5 inch rims, equipped with sticky road tires. But KTM and Husaberg sell wheels with a cush drive, so a solution is within range.
Now, if a person should change oil often and regularly check the leveln only use synthetic oil of the best quality, use a wheel with cush drive, install a final gearing that is suitable for road use, and drive normally (not at 160 km per hour for extended periods) then I cannot see why these engines would not be able to support this. A mono that is spinning at 6500 rpm, well serviced, using good oil, and receiving plenty of cooling at 120 km/hour should suffer less then a bike that is driven in the woods or in a dessert.
Or am I overlooking something ? Dale, I would very much apreciate your opinion on this assumption.