However, this question is perhaps a little controversially. Since the KTM 525 engine and the Husaberg 501 engine are very similar, why does the KTM feel easier to handle?
Part of the answer is the frame and the steering geometry. The Husabergs are much more stabile at higher speeds, especially in the sand washes and on hardpack trails that have loose pebbles on top.
The 525 engine diagram shows 2 counterbalancers that are running at a lower rpm compared to the Husaberg counterbalancer. The KTM counterbalancers have larger gears on the counterbalancers and a smaller gear drives them, therefore they would be spinning at a lower rpm, relatively. Since enertia is a product of mass X the square of the velocity, the Husaberg design will have more enertia effect. Double your rpm = 4 times the enertia = more gyroscopic effect.
I found that if I make a conscious, deliberate effort to toss the bike sideways when leaning in the turns, I can consistantly get the bike to lean better and the gyroscopic effect seems to help keep the bike stabile in the turn after the bike is leaning.
The Husaberg bikes, in my opinion, perform better at higher speeds. The bike is designed to be ridden fast. The bike is not designed for very slow, technical trails.
Yesterday, while riding, this was reconfirmed. When negotiating 1st and 2nd gear turns, my son on his KTM literally left me in his dust. But when we were in the higher speed sections, 3rd gear turns, we were about equal, and in 4th to 5th gear turns, the Husaberg turned better. The Husaberg was able to go faster throught the turns and exit at a higher speed.