Ohlins TTX on the new Bergs?

Husaberg

Help Support Husaberg:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
try the SPI-3 too

I don't like it in forks because it retains bubbles too easily but with the pressurised TTX it should be fine may be a little heavy though, then i would use BP bartran HV15 or HV22
 
FINALLY!!!! After 2 months waiting,shipping etc, my 2010 TTX stuff is here,ready to be mounted on my 09 FE570-shock,springs,cartridges,tools:) The crazy thing is that the shock is to be mounted upside down 8O ...I have no idea how it will look like, but will see these days. :bounce3:
 
Give us a ride reoprt soon. I will have some revalved CC forks and a re-revalved shock today............. :cheers:
 
will do for sure....I was planning to try and hopefully polish the fork's lower tubes...now I believe I will not be patient enough with all these fancy boxes around my bed :cheers:
 
suhoi27 said:
FINALLY!!!! After 2 months waiting,shipping etc, my 2010 TTX stuff is here,ready to be mounted on my 09 FE570-shock,springs,cartridges,tools:) The crazy thing is that the shock is to be mounted upside down 8O ...I have no idea how it will look like, but will see these days. :bounce3:
Click to expand...

Could you take a picture of the shock?? I wanna see it.
 
mud400 said:
suhoi27 said:
FINALLY!!!! After 2 months waiting,shipping etc, my 2010 TTX stuff is here,ready to be mounted on my 09 FE570-shock,springs,cartridges,tools:) The crazy thing is that the shock is to be mounted upside down 8O ...I have no idea how it will look like, but will see these days. :bounce3:
Click to expand...

Could you take a picture of the shock?? I wanna see it.
Click to expand...
+1
 
[attachment=0:1f088288]P1120522-2.jpg[/attachment:1f088288]

[attachment=1:1f088288]P1120519-2.jpg[/attachment:1f088288]



well. I am not sure if I was able to publish the initial pictures properly and I am not sure if this is the crazy way to put the shock in-Just wrote Harry Reed a mail for confirmation....at least the manual says so.....I am not the best believer though......If everything is ok, I will put the shock and cartridges tomorrow....... :mrgreen:
 

Attachments

  • P1120519-2.jpg
    P1120519-2.jpg
    77.1 KB
  • P1120522-2.jpg
    P1120522-2.jpg
    111.6 KB
Upside down, I never thought about that. It looks like there is almost enough room to build a spacer and use a KTM shock.

I guess an email to Harry is in order. This is an expensive post.......
 
upside down forks and now shocks :twisted:

looks nicer really as the shaft is more protected from the rear wheel dirt

how close is the chain to the res though?
 
mmmm not convinced of the shock being up side down, more unsprung weight and the reservior is going to get hammered, plus the adjustment clickers will get coated in crap, seems like a lazy solution to me, looks like they didnt want to bother to make a proper one with the reservior at the top which would have needed new casting/s

in a word...................dissapointed

makes the Coppersmith custom build ones look a better option
 
I think some of you guys are showing how young you are. That is right side up. The way they use to be. Then somewheres around 1977 Marty Smith showed up with a RCII that had the shocks upside down. As Gazza said, less unsprung weight. Even the first uni-shock suspension had the shock body on the bottom.
SR125.jpg
 
But it looks like they made a new casting on the top to connect to the swingarm.

Agree somewhat disappointing. I can see how tipping the bike on the shifter side in the rocks could be very bad for the reservoir.
 
anyone got any clues, aside from lazyiness, why they put it upside down ??

Loooks to it would fit the other way up, would it hit the tank ?? must be some reason...................still dont like it though, not like Ohlins to do a half arsed job :roll:

Coppersmith will do a custom one right way up by modding a KTM one re the bolt on fittings, but about an extra $800 :cry: I held off on getting one while wating for the off the shelf production model, but now :?
 
It looks like it would fit but you may not be able to get at the adjustment screws.


Opps, it would probably hit the tank, i forget the tanks extend to the rear subframe, with a space towards the frame for the shock. If the Ohlins were upright the reservoir would point toward the subframe and I am pretty sure the reservoir and the tank would take up the same space.
 
JoeT said:
It looks like it would fit but you may not be able to get at the adjustment screws.


Opps, it would probably hit the tank, i forget the tanks extend to the rear subframe, with a space towards the frame for the shock. If the Ohlins were upright the reservoir would point toward the subframe and I am pretty sure the reservoir and the tank would take up the same space.
Click to expand...


Is it a very different shape or size compared to the stock WP one ?? Looks similar by the photos.

It should fit, as I said Coppersmith have modded KTM ones to fit ok.
 
Gazza said:
anyone got any clues, aside from lazyiness, why they put it upside down ??

Loooks to it would fit the other way up, would it hit the tank ?? must be some reason...................still dont like it though, not like Ohlins to do a half arsed job :roll:

Coppersmith will do a custom one right way up by modding a KTM one re the bolt on fittings, but about an extra $800 :cry: I held off on getting one while wating for the off the shelf production model, but now :?
Click to expand...

So you can adjust the preload with out taking off the shock.....

According to some. The coppersmith is the half assed one.... But I am not naming names. :evil:
 
Mr. Guinea Pig (me) made few more pictures showing different comparisons with OEM WP shock. As for TTX: it seems that the reservoir is protected from any direct mud coming from the rear tire, the casting also seems to be build on purpose- there is a small screw in one of the corners though coming from inside the shock....weird bike-weird parts :twisted:

I will make also weight comparison today but so far the TTX shock's body seems lighter than WP's


[attachment=1:1ckkchxb]P1120525-2.jpg[/attachment:1ckkchxb]
[attachment=2:1ckkchxb]P1120524-2.jpg[/attachment:1ckkchxb]
[attachment=0:1ckkchxb]P1120523-2.jpg[/attachment:1ckkchxb]
 

Attachments

  • P1120524-2.jpg
    P1120524-2.jpg
    69.9 KB
  • P1120525-2.jpg
    P1120525-2.jpg
    47 KB
  • P1120523-2.jpg
    P1120523-2.jpg
    127.3 KB
[attachment=2:gmzon7pp]P1120526-2.jpg[/attachment:gmzon7pp]
[attachment=1:gmzon7pp]P1120527-2.jpg[/attachment:gmzon7pp]
[attachment=0:gmzon7pp]P1120528-2.jpg[/attachment:gmzon7pp]



I believe there must be a better way to publish pictures........forgive me this time-I am obsessed today :bounce:
 

Attachments

  • P1120526-2.jpg
    P1120526-2.jpg
    52.7 KB
  • P1120527-2.jpg
    P1120527-2.jpg
    80.7 KB
  • P1120528-2.jpg
    P1120528-2.jpg
    78 KB
[attachment=2:3bkpsak1]P1120529-2.jpg[/attachment:3bkpsak1]
[attachment=1:3bkpsak1]P1120530-2.jpg[/attachment:3bkpsak1]
[attachment=0:3bkpsak1]P1120531-2.jpg[/attachment:3bkpsak1]
 

Attachments

  • P1120529-2.jpg
    P1120529-2.jpg
    58.9 KB
  • P1120530-2.jpg
    P1120530-2.jpg
    54 KB
  • P1120531-2.jpg
    P1120531-2.jpg
    65.9 KB

Similar threads

H
Ohlins rear shock on a 2007 FS
Replies
8
Views
2K
husakeits
H
E
Hello from España! new owner of a Husaberg FE 501 1996 project bike.
Replies
2
Views
586
Sa63
S
M
New to Husaberg
Replies
2
Views
336
Maurice Turner
M
Whosaberg
2011 FE390
Replies
0
Views
53
Whosaberg
Whosaberg
C
570 FE
Replies
10
Views
485
eeazye
E

Register CTA

Register on Husaberg Forum! This sidebar will go away, and you will see fewer ads.

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions

Back
Top