- Joined
- Nov 23, 2012
- Messages
- 2,382
- Location
- Iceland
bump! I'm actually honestly really interested in what MPG you're getting wolfster data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
On the 570, I'm seeing about 35-37 MPG. Flogging the bike in open desert I see 35. Steady and slow on the trails, I get 37. There isn't much of a mileage variation between slow single track, or WTFO hare scrambles.
Now the bike was re flashed when I bought it since they threw on a Leo slip on, but I'm almost positive it was just to richen up a few points across the board.
Does the software allow to data log? Or tune only on a Dyno?
If I can data log, then the tuning could be endless, or at least until I break something.
On the 570, I'm seeing about 35-37 MPG. Flogging the bike in open desert I see 35. Steady and slow on the trails, I get 37. There isn't much of a mileage variation between slow single track, or WTFO hare scrambles.
Now the bike was re flashed when I bought it since they threw on a Leo slip on, but I'm almost positive it was just to richen up a few points across the board.
Does the software allow to data log? Or tune only on a Dyno?
If I can data log, then the tuning could be endless, or at least until I break something.
That's lower MPG than I've seen mentioned, for sure I'd think.
Anyone have any ideas what could be causing it?
Blockages in pumps / injectors, can they cause this? Slightly off sensors?
Could the accelerator pump setting have been squeezed up a little too high with the UST maybe?
my 570 is a gas-guzzler! in 'Taff's racing season' at the beginning of 2011 I think it was I did a season opener on my new mo-sheen and ran out of fuel while leading in the morning. it was heavy going but it couldn't even do 1.5 hours.
in the afternoon it was drier and it finished with a litre to spare. my 400 could do the same with about 3 litres to spare. my record was over 4 hours racing if I recall on one 9 litre tank.
it's important to remember that I lambasted those that said that Fi was the be-all-and-end-all as I knew it wasn't. from the off it was going to be better yet this web site is littered with people with various DNS or DNF ailments and they don't even know where to start to look.
the bloody codes are a waste of time. they tell you, you have a problem but they don't tell you where you have a problem.
EFi might get better in the future, and that is the point, it has the potential to be a lot better.
I come from muddier climbs than most and when the bikes are wet and don't work WTF are you supposed to make of it in the middle of a forest?
Taffy
Now look herev ********, that point was made to point out to those that think Fi is great that it doesn't help you solve the problem. the mechanic has to do the work.
luckily, I do have the skill set and I do always get the job done, cheaply and efficiently.
one guy came to us last year, head spent 1,400 gbp with Gearfor and they still hadn't found it. they'd used KTMs tech whizz guys, they used their bells and whistles machines and we found it in three hours and it cost him with the parts 300 quid.
a numpty skull thicko like you isn't even in the phuqin bike trade to tell anyone anything.
you've proved countless times that you daren't put anything on the line.
YOU SIR, WOULD BE THE VERY FIRST TO REPALCE EVERYTHING
get a life and phuq off back under your rock.
Taffy
this is an example of your technical input and don't talk to anyone here about how bright you are after this:
http://husaberg.org/wheels-tires/20498-what-size-front-tyre.html
quoting old 60s tyre sizes to people? is that how technically advanced you are?
you need to pull your horns in fella
Taffy