Gokai134 said:Hi Pastullo,
could please explain me your modification, as I don´t understand it?
Isn´t it so, that the idea behind the breather modification/ disconnection in general is, that no oil-mist at all is getting into the airbox/ frame?
With only one the rear tube disconnected the oil-mist- still has the possibility get into the airbox, or? ( in case of a crash?)
Taffy said:....but there is a sponge gauze in the wide part of the neck to stop the oil and let it drop back down to the engine?
there is also a huge shelf above the chain blocking the oil makng a direct run up the pipe. whoever was the first to start this idea just didn't look at it properly?
having two breathers saves power and saves the engine - especially when it's old. i say that this mod is a mistake and whoever did it first should.....
regards
Taffy
pastullo said:right sotos! now it fits pretty nice in there!
BTW how are you and your husaberg?
Gokai134 said:There might be also some technical reason for using it, but i prefer the simple answer:why is (or better was) even the factory team disconnect it from the frame?
Has anybody seen any engine (bike or car) over the last years, that is allowed to pass it´s "internal engine gases" direct into the atmosphere?
I´m a very strong believer that the "connection" of the engine breather into the frame/airbox is a result of emission regulations.
And nothing else.
I like it simple: if it´s not there, it can´t be broken!
or in case of a crash, it can´t flood my carb with oil
peter