This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

TPS

Joined Aug 2006
178 Posts | 0+
Gunnison Colorado
Just checking adjustments on my 550. Found the tps WAY out of adjustment, as in 1100ohms versus the 750+- 50 spec. Since my cheapo home bit set couldn't budge the tamper torx screws without stripping them I just disconnected it for now, as lineaweaver posts suggest. It seems to run different? I will run it on some real trails, oops I mean fire roads :moon: , to get more of a feel for the change. Just thought I would add collective knowledge!

jz
 
Now more confusion for me!

I pulled the tank off today (only picked it up on Tuesday) to find the TPS disconnected and the wiring at the TPS block looking burnt. I cant tell yet if it was external heat or heat from an electrical short but when I bought the bike it seemed to run OK.
So do I replace the part or not?

Has anyone tested a bike with the TPS connected or disconnected?
 
Blunny said:
Now more confusion for me!

I pulled the tank off today (only picked it up on Tuesday) to find the TPS disconnected and the wiring at the TPS block looking burnt. I cant tell yet if it was external heat or heat from an electrical short but when I bought the bike it seemed to run OK.
So do I replace the part or not?

Has anyone tested a bike with the TPS connected or disconnected?

i used to run my 650 with the TPS disconnected ..re dale lineaweaver
 
lol^ Well I am not sure of any real difference, maybe smoother of the bottom campared to a misadjusted tps. However, the old faithful w/p leak appeared, so I was distracted. It came shooting out like a water gun! Luckily I keep gaskets and seals in stock, I can't believe it went 35 hours before erupting. I digress, Dale I have snap-on tamper torx bits at work, I was going to bring them home along with a rpm pick-up for my dvom, to make a "by the book" adjustment. It would seem, for most riders the tps plugged in or not will not make much of a difference for a seat of the pants experience. I will report back on a properly adjusted tps in a few days....

jz
 
I can discern little if any seat of the pants acceleration difference with the TPS connected or unplugged. I did add an on/off toggle switch to the TPS; and I do find that my engine ['04 KTM 525 (540) EXC] seems to run a little smoother down low, which is helpful on technical single track, with the TPS switched off. Perhaps this is due to the decrease in advance caused by of the removal of the additional part throttle advance added by the TPS.
 
Just taking a wild guess here............

It would seem to me that with the tps not properly "zeroed" the computer would think that the carb was actually running at larger throttle openings, and would therefore advance the ignition to provide more power, when in fact the opposite was true.

If I am not mistaken the resistance through the tps increases as the throttle opens, and thus is telling the computer what position the slide is in.

So, if you just unplug the tps you have an open circuit, and therefore unlimited resistance, I would think that the computer would default to a full advance setting, just like the SEM two map ignitions on the earlier bikes did when you unplugged the gray wire.

I could be talking through my hat here since the two ignitions are different. And the Kokusan and it's corresponding CDI program could have a different default setting.

Like I said in my linked post, someone spent a great deal of time and money putting that tps in the system in the first place.

Dale
 
I will attempt to convey the essence of what DL told me about the TPS and how it related to Hbgs - I am going from memory and it being what it is ....

In short, the TPS system was designed for small bore multi cylinder engines and it was created mostly to improve fuel mileage at cruise conditions for these motors (steady partial throttle) and it poses some risk to big bore Hbg's.

He went on to say that a 650 Hbg at light steady throttle on a slight uphill (ie under mild load) could approach near 100% volumetric efficiency and with the TPS in place this could produce significant stress on the bottom end bearings.

I believe I have captured the essence of what DL told me - it was a fuel economy effort and is inappropriate on a high performance short range motorcycle, he recommended I disconnect it.

Cheers

Mark
 
DaleEO said:
So, if you just unplug the tps you have an open circuit, and therefore unlimited resistance, I would think that the computer would default to a full advance setting, just like the SEM two map ignitions on the earlier bikes did when you unplugged the gray wire.

Dale

When the TPS is disconnected, the engine reverts to the default built-in advance curve. The TPS functions to add advance to the default advance curve primarily at low RPM partial throttle operation much like the vacuum advance in autos. The TPS advance contribution gradually diminishes as the throttle is opened up and RPM increases, i.e. when there is a higher load on the engine in order to curtail detonation.
 
I adjusted the tps today. It definately pulls harder plugged in. Worth checking and adjusting as necessary. Being at high elevation, the engine benefits from more advance. Thanks for all your input!

jz
 
Ok, I have read all posts for the TPS stuff & I have decided that I will replace my sensor block.
Is it the same FCR as a Yamaha 450? Would the sensors interchange?
I checked bike bandit and the Yam part is $50 US cheaper. Thats a good incentive!
 

Register CTA

Register on Husaberg Forum! This sidebar will go away, and you will see fewer ads.

Recent Discussions