Husabergler said:
If you have a spare in the correct dimensions and spoke count,compare the spoke holes for angle and diameter.
You are right about the spoke holes being drilled in the right direction! Your comment made me go & look at what I have at home. This post is especially important to anyone who wants to lace their own front wheel (eg SM wheels) for a '99 or earlier Husaberg.
It would seem there are two ways the spoke patterns can work. Typically disc brake wheels have the same PCD (pitch circle diameter) of the spoke anchor holes in each side of the hub. Looking at one side of the wheel, a spoke pattern is established between the closest side of the the hub and every second spoke hole in the rim. This same pattern is then copied to the other side of the hub but, because it must fill the spoke holes in between those used by the first side, this pattern must be indexed or rotated by the angle between two spoke holes at the rim. The direction of this indexing (clockwise or counterclockwise) dictates the direction spoke holes in the rim will have to be drilled at to line up with the spokes. It means that a rim that suits one type will not lend itself to being laced onto a hub of the other without doing a real crappy spoking job.
The only wheels I can find so far in photos of bikes that index CCW from closest to furthest side are 'berg front wheels from 1989 thru to 1999. Everything else I found, including 'berg fronts from 2000 onwards and all 'berg rears seem to index CW. A KTM front from 1995, both ends of a Gas Gas EC400 and even the pic of the bike (Jap?) on the box of a new tube I bought was CW.
CCW rims seem much less common. So far I have not found any rear wheels of this type.
The Excel front rim that was on my '98 bike was obviously (now anyway!) not original or correct as it was 1.85" wide rather than the normal 1.60" for a 'berg and its spoke holes are drilled for a CW spoke pattern while the hub is CCW. The misalignment between the spoke nipple & the nipple hole in the rim explains why the wheel "looked a bit funny" and half of the spokes have a kink in them where the nipple screws on. The bloody Akront front rim I was going to use is drilled in almost the same way as the Excel that came off the the bike - ie CW. Short of welding up every second spoke hole & redrilling them I don't think I can use the rim.
Spoke patterns are not always the same each side for drum brake wheels that have the anchors on the periphery of the drum on one side only. The Akront rim, off an old drum brake hub, has its spoke holes that were on the drum side drilled so they are splayed a bit more that the rest.
A question that now springs to mind - What the hell can happen to a bike that would require the replacement of BOTH rims, with the front one replaced twice???? The rest of the bike looks to have had a relatively easy life(?) but now that I think about it, the front axle was bent and it may have had a case welded near the front lower engine mount - a spot not renowned for cracking. If this thing has been through a restoration, it has been damn well done!
Now that you mention it, the reason I have the KTM front is it was an old one that had been replaced on a previous bike. The reason it got replaced is that it had cracked through the seam (similar to my ‘berg) and someone has attempted to weld it but botched the job. It is a DID rim. It looks like all the brands bust occasionally.