This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Reminder:

Joined Jul 2001
3K Posts | 1+
El Sobrante, Ca. 94803
To quote an old friend:

"It's only fuel and air!" :lol:

Mark Dobeck, founder of Dynojet Research.

Dale
 
Thanks for clearing that up, Dale. Whew!, for a while there I've been telling people it's AIR and FUEL. :oops: :oops:
 
doctorcorey said:
Thanks for clearing that up, Dale. Whew!, for a while there I've been telling people it's AIR and FUEL. :oops: :oops:

Truth be told a carburetor near WOT is little more than the equivalent of a rag soaked in petrol.

Sometimes I forget how basic a device it really is. Perspective being critical and all.
:lol: LOL

Best Regards,
Dale
 
I argued with a guy, once, for about an hour after I tried in vain to explain to him that a gasoline engine is most efficient(that is, work performed for fuel consumed) at WOT because it expends the least amount of energy ingesting the air it requires to make it's power. Now, I realise that this is slightly oversimplified, but a few control factors aside, it's true. Now I'm trying to figure out what my point was for writing this! :oops: :?: No doubt a few of you are wondering the same thing. :!:
 

Register CTA

Register on Husaberg Forum! This sidebar will go away, and you will see fewer ads.

Recent Discussions