This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Looking at a Husaberg purchase - 2006, 2008, or new 2009?

Joined Sep 2008
6 Posts | 0+
Hi from a newbie to this site!

A brief history on myself:
About 1 year ago I purchased a new 2007 Kawasaki KLX-250S and I have ridden it about 6,000 miles. I do the simple wrenching on it and have done simple mods like decorking it, new front fork springs, new exhaust, and similar stuff. I have been riding on the street and off road in Arizona (USA). It's time for an upgrade to support my growing experience and demands.

I DO NOT want a Kawasaki/Suzuki/Honda 650 dual sport that weighs over 300lbs and has weak suspension. From reading a lot on ADVrider, ThumperTalk, and a few other sites, I was generally pushed towards KTM options like the 690 Enduro or the Husqvarna TE-610. I made the pilgrimage to Premier Motorsports in Phoenix, Arizona to look at the Husqvarna TE-610 and soon realized it was not for me with it's weight and my lack of being a body builder to wrestle such a heavy ride off-road. The Husaberg they had on the showroom floor really appealed to me. In addition to it's lighter weight, it appears to have superior suspension to what I see on similar rides including the various Japanese models I have looked at.

Assessing my purchase options (all new) , I can get a 2006 FE-450 in Phoenix or a 2008 FE-450 shipped on the low side of ~$6K. The main differences I have found between the 2006 and 2008 FE-450 models is the lack of accessory lights for dual sporting in the factory crate for the 2008 over the 2006 which are included and the black Excel rims and forks on the 2008 which look like a cosmetic maintenance issue when they get scratched up offroad.

I'm also trying to assess whether I should wait and save a little longer to get the new 2009 model. Currently, I think I would prefer the 2006/2008 carb over the 2009 EFI model since it is a simpler well proven fuel/air delivery system that is unlikely to cause me trouble. The EFI would probably be nice for cold weather riding and altitude changes (9000 down to 2000 feet). The new 2009 motor looks trick and probably has some handling advantage that the prior version lacks however the prior generation seems to be a really good handling ride. I'm also a little concerned the new 2009's may have some teething troubles that come with most new clean sheet designs.

What advice do you have for someone like myself with limited but growing experience? Should I avoid the extra expense and possible new model problems of the 2009's and stick with the proven prior generation? Since the Phoenix dealer really isn't local to me, should I opt for shipping in a crated 2008 FE-450 at a similar price point and building it up and plating it myself? What other issues and considerations am I missing?

TIA,
Sid
 
Sid,
If you are going to be doing some dual sporting I woukl suggest a 550 or a 650. I think there are a few used ones available in Az.
The chances of even purchasing an 09 are slim to none right now. With the economy down, now is a good time to be a buyer.
 
welcome el sid o great one!

i suggest that as long as you're going to be happy with 450cc , you're best to get the 2008 at a great price but remember that cheap in will one day mean cheap out.

i would like ken, recommend you hold off the 2009s as they have yet to be proven.

how about a test ride on that '06 and then get the '08. and can ppremier get you the same deal? i think they can because there are too many 450s around and they want them OUT.

go into the doc on the left of screena nd look at the ist chapter: "year recognition...."

regards

Taffy
 
I've got one of the new 08 FE450's - and I love it - I actually prefer the older style, with its simplicity and easy maintenance (I assume the new engine has underbucket shims as opposed to screws?).
And I'll rather have a carburator over fuel injection on something that I'm most likely going to drown from time to time...

The 450 has more than enough grunt for serious enduro and mx - and it's not slow on gravel roads, but for tarmac I'd go 650.

/J
 
i've got both a 450 and a 650 and ride them in the same terrain you would be riding in. with limited experience overall and coming off a 250 klx, my opinion is that a 650 would make you a good dualsport once you get used to the "pucker factor" it comes with if you keep it out of the knarly stuff and use it to explore back roads and the like.
i have ridden my 650 in the nasties, but my 450 is the preferred bike for that, the 650 tends to dig trenches when the going gets hard. but cruising on the road, the 450 isn't happy. it will do it, but i feel its being abused. gear the 650 up significantly and it will do the job and the low first gear will still be low enough to go slow when you want. BUT BE AWARE THIS IS NOT A KLX OR XR. IT IS NOT FOR THE FAINT OF HEART.
(but i guess if berger can toss one around the mile markers, it can't be that bad 8) )
 
Thanks everyone. It sounds like a 2006/2008 model is the better choice for me from what I quickly read last night and in this thread.

I had sort of initially ruled out the 650 thinking it would be too harsh in the power department off road so not that much fun. Also, all the guys I see off road seem to really prefer the 400-450cc rides. Since the weight on a 450/550/650 Husaberg is essentially the same with very similar powerplants, the only thing I seem to be trading off is brute power. However, a 650 with tall gearing for street use would probably reduce the nastiness off road of brutal acceleration and power (60+ RW HP).

I rode a KTM 380 2-smoke once. That thing would run like I have never seen. It was so fast accelerating with such harsh brutal power I didn't actually enjoy riding it. However, my skill level at the time was very low so it was clearly way over my head and I really shouldn't have been in the saddle on that monster ride. Even today, I don't think I would ride that thing anywhere but a smooth open field.

I think I might start shopping for a used 650. If I can find one for a good price that isn't too beat up, it might prove a better choice for me. Is the "Owner's Doc" link a good place to read up on what to look for in a used Husaberg? I really want to make sure I don't end up buying someone else's problematic ride.
 
sidpost said:
Is the "Owner's Doc" link a good place to read up on what to look for in a used Husaberg? I really want to make sure I don't end up buying someone else's problematic ride.

to be honest no. it's not constructed to help the man who might get one, rather it's there to help keep what you have running or to improve it, upgrade it etc.

get anything post '03 and you'll be pretty much ok. that was the big year of change.

regards

Taffy
 
what about the 06 fe550e in mesa that's in the classifieds?
 
What are the average sales prices of new 2008 models? US pricing information in dollars seems to be hard to find.

That 550 in Mesa, AZ may get a visit from me in a week or two.

Thanks,
Sid
 
sidpost
I concur with your reasoning that you don't want to be a guinea pig on the 2009 models. That bike will likely be most appreciated by racers who will put up with the oddities for a year or two. The 2006 to 2008 models are great bikes. Note that in spite of all the great things we hear about the 2009 models, the factory team riders are going no faster (maybe even slower) on the 2009 bikes. Of course that will change quickly once they quite beta testing setups (the current race bikes are clearly R&D bikes with different settings every week), whereas the old race bikes (like my 496) were finely tuned. If you were closer to me, I would offer you a chance to ride (and buy) my 496, since I am getting 2009 fever.
 
When I called a dealer about the 450/550/650 options, the guy on the phone said that even though they all weigh the same, the 650 would feel 30 pounds heavier when I rode it. Does the extra mass in motion really have that much affect on the ride quality? Is this part of the reason why the 450's seem to rule most places that aren't wide open and high speed? I know the extra power in a 650 can be a little tougher to use in tight twisty knarly stuff but, the sales guy indicated it was really about the extra rotational mass.

This statement also seemed to tie into the 2009 models pretty well so, it may have just been a sales pitch to sell me a 2009 model.

Thanks!
Sid
 
I was chatting to cafey18 recently and he told me that he and MeDogRocket and one other had their 450, 550 and 650 out on the same day and swapped from bike to bike. They confirmed that the bigger the engine. the harder it is to turn.

Pm them for more info, or maybe they'll write it up.

Steve
 

Attachments

  • CadlinkMIMEa03528.pdf
    18.5 KB
Sidpost whoever told you that a 650 feels heavier than a 450 tells no lie!

This is something that is not open for dispute, just law's of physic's.

Just ride a 250 then ride a 300 you have your answer!
 
I like the 08 models myself.. You can get a 08 450 at least 3 K cheaper than an 09.

If you've ever ridden a ktm RFS engine the 08 berg 450 feels samiliar only with more torque and engine braking. Sort of an old school 4 stroke motor. Power is smooth and easy to ride. I'm 260 lbs and it has no problems moving me around faster than i want to go.
Ergo's are cramped stock for tall guys.

I've put 1000 miles east coast DS & enduro with no issues other than a little seepage around the countershaft in 2.5 months. Bikes are easy to work on with the exception being the carb which is a PITA to get to because of the frame.
 

Register CTA

Register on Husaberg Forum! This sidebar will go away, and you will see fewer ads.

Recent Discussions