This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Husaberg again with exclamation point

Joined Dec 2001
798 Posts | 0+
Bellingham, WA
New folks to Hbg might not know me and what a proponent of Hbg I am, especially with my TM moniker. Most everyone knows that Hbg has had a roller coaster ride with ownership, quality, and distributors.
I embraced the original 1989 Hbgs (a bike the rewrote the rules), buying a 92 when they got a foothold in the USA, and along with others, I suffered thru some of the problems of the later '90s models and and pre-2004 models, only to see Hbg clearly have a superior bike (although unrightfully lacking respece) in the 2004 to 2008 models.
I have been setting back watching the 2009 reviews come out and must say, I am amazed at the satisfaction. Back when Hbg released the original bikes in 1989, they were great, but small, so the competition took note, but wasn't too worried. The 2009 Hbg models have to make the competition feel like they got kicked in the junk, and they can't guard themselves. Thomas, Roland, and the gang (there is new blood that also embraces thinking outside the box) have staged another coup. Now let's just hope that the factory WEC team can realized success on the new bikes, since their performance on the 2009 prototypes was a notch below their performance on the older bikes
(no dig intended here, the old bikes were detailed to the Nth degree, whereas they were doing constant R&D on the 2009 prototypes and learning every race).
Go Loke.
 
tm-enduro said:
Now let's just hope that the factory WEC team can realize success on the new bikes, since their performance on the 2009 prototypes was a notch below their performance on the older bikes
(no dig intended here, the old bikes were detailed to the Nth degree, whereas they were doing constant R&D on the 2009 prototypes and learning every race).
Go Loke.

i have said this before. i'm sort of 'pleased' that you feel the same way. they are obviously still a small R & D team becaus ethere is no way they should have been sorting things out this summer. there's no time with amajor problem to sort it in time to order the parts for production.

i pray they got it right first time but if they didn't....

welll. we'll soon know! did anyone say clutch?

regards

Taffy
 
Taffy said:
I have said this before. i'm sort of 'pleased' that you feel the same way. they are obviously still a small R & D team becaus ethere is no way they should have been sorting things out this summer. there's no time with amajor problem to sort it in time to order the parts for production.

i pray they got it right first time but if they didn't....

welll. we'll soon know! did anyone say clutch?

regards

Taffy

I suspect that the WEC race team was spending more time on production test mules trying to get production settings than they were trying to customizing the production bike for each individual in WEC competition.
 
i concur 100% and then some more.

so let's hope (and i said it before) that they found nothing insirmountable? after all this is a unique bike handling wise. if they had discovered a wobble ar a weave in that dept they would have really been flumoxed.

regards

Taffy
 
tm-enduro said:
Taffy said:
I have said this before. i'm sort of 'pleased' that you feel the same way. they are obviously still a small R & D team becaus ethere is no way they should have been sorting things out this summer. there's no time with amajor problem to sort it in time to order the parts for production.

i pray they got it right first time but if they didn't....

welll. we'll soon know! did anyone say clutch?

regards

Taffy

I suspect that the WEC race team was spending more time on production test mules trying to get production settings than they were trying to customizing the production bike for each individual in WEC competition.

I agree. What I understand they have used fairly standard engines, with different Efi Maps
butt almost standard to test the production engine on race conditions. Next year Joakim Ljunggren is telling on hes site that they are going to test different engines now for the next year. I think this mean tuned-modified engines. And with the history Husaberg has to Mx-composites I think they are testing the composite conrod. And what will the effect be? a engine that feels like a 125 with the power off a 450?? if so I don't see that there its much more to do to an engine that affects the handling off a bike that can be done.
And the competition are going to do in there pants when they are being aware of there engines are 10 years after in evolution :twisted:

HUSABERG RULES.

Regards
 

Register CTA

Register on Husaberg Forum! This sidebar will go away, and you will see fewer ads.

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions