This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Front end issues

Joined Jul 2005
28 Posts | 0+
The bike: 2003 501

The rider: 33 year old male 220 lbs (yes I'm fat) with maybe a novice to intermediate ability

The problem: It feels like my front springs are too soft. When I ride trail whoops the front tire and suspension suck up a lot more than the rear. This makes the back end start to buck a bit. I could ride a little faster, but if I screw 'em up and stuff the front end into one, it gets ugly. The back seems to be good, maybe a little more rebound damp, but not much. What are the springs that come stock? What weight should I switch to?
 
Stiff_Bubba said:
The bike: 2003 501

The rider: 33 year old male 220 lbs (yes I'm fat) with maybe a novice to intermediate ability

The problem: It feels like my front springs are too soft. When I ride trail whoops the front tire and suspension suck up a lot more than the rear. This makes the back end start to buck a bit. I could ride a little faster, but if I screw 'em up and stuff the front end into one, it gets ugly. The back seems to be good, maybe a little more rebound damp, but not much. What are the springs that come stock? What weight should I switch to?

I would guess that .42's are stock. I would say that you need at least .46's for your weight. That is what I am running in my '05 and they are still borderline soft.
 
come on stiffy - have a look at our suspension guide in 'the doc'! someone has got to look at it!

what type of riding are we talking and where?

at 220 pounds you need 48s front. i weigh 200 and run 48s, they were a big improvement over 46s.

on the rear i run the heaviest PDS spring available from WP - a PDS4 which is 85/111 and it's still too soft. it's not bad but i know that it's too soft!

a straight rate spring is required. tom "115EXC450" from k-talk suspension is 220 and he runs 46 front and 94 rear. he has bought a 98 rear convinced the 94 isn't doing the job. i believe him. he's tryiong it imminently as we only spoke at the weekend. i want a 96/98 myself and i weigh as said just 200.

if you have an FE you're running a 71/90 rear and 42 or 44 front which are hopelessly low. the parts manual will tell you what you have. go find your year and check the part code and the numbers will have either 42 or 44 in them. the parts books are in downloads.

when looking at a PDS spring, forget the second number just think of the basic spring rate - the first number. so: '71' or in my case '85'.

hope this helps. bet you do nowt about it but it does gi9ve me a chance to waist another 15 minutes of my time. :lol: :lol:

regards

Taffy
 
48s in the front, PDS8 in the rear, that's what I have (6', 240 in gear -I've got big bones!!!).

Think about some goodies, like Enzo subtanks. I have some. Great improvement (will post photos and ride report when the gods of heat decide to lower the thermostat).

Stiffer forks help during turns too, not just in the whoops section.
 
Good start on the information, thanks to all. I live in Idaho and ride mostly single track (and a dreaded 4 wheeler trail when I have to) I will read the susp page when I get home tonight, Taffy. Like I have said before, this is my first bike and first 1000 miles on a bike. I grew up riding sleds and suspension for sleds in deep snow is more about track angle and location. Where as on a bike it is the difference between on the bike or off the bike. I've been off the bike way too many times way too fast in these first 1000 miles and I think the suspension is not helping me stay upright
 

Register CTA

Register on Husaberg Forum! This sidebar will go away, and you will see fewer ads.

Recent Discussions