Joined Jan 2008
4 Posts | 0+
Finland
oyk said:Johnf3 said:Who cares how many HP the old 650s had? The new Husabergs are a superior machine in all other aspects. Who cares if your old 650 has "more power" when you get smoked by a superior motorcycle? Besides maybe in a drag race, or a specialized desert or rally race with lots of opportunity to hold it wide open, a 650 is not an advantage.
The MXDN in England is going on right now. Ryan Villopoto on a 250F will beat the majority if not the entire field of 450s when he lines up against those riders. We are talking about the best 450 mx riders in the world. So, if they can't use the superior power to beat smaller bikes in a race, do you think you can?
I'm guess I'm just not in to specs and horsepower "on paper".
the posters question was purely in aspect of power.
every one here must show respect to any member asking something specific and not try to convice that he is a stupid human being if he cares for horse power specs.
so my answer was that specific.
besides, i do care alot because i ride tarmac besides enduro.
in supermoto trackdays power is a great factor for fun.
and fun is a great feedback for me personally when i ride my bikes.
also i would wait to test ride a bike first before i say it is superior than another bike.
some may like it some others not but i decided to buy that old 2008 650 AFTER i rode the 2009.
for my style of riding and preferences i found them very "soft".
every individual here has his own preferences and believes and as far as i am concerned i thing that many here would still love their "old" bikes after testing the new ones.
this is the reason also that some of us still keep running their 15 old husabergs.
Totally agree. Thre are different bikes, riders, needs, races, goals, etc and based on those we make our choices. It is so hard for someone else to say that you have made wrong choice..
And still: What is wrong with big HP if that is fun to use and makes rider