FE550E Vs. the FE650E ?

My opinion. The 550 is a go fast bike, it revs quickly and pulls hard. The 650 is more of a tractor. It revs a little slower and tends to put the power to the ground a little better. The 650 has a faster top speed but will take just alittle longer to get there. The torque and roost factor is way up on the fun meter. If I was going to race I think I would get the 550. For desert and trail riding I think you have to go with the 650. I tend to enjoy riding the 650 more, it really is a fun bike.
You can not compare a 450 to either one of these bikes. It is not even in the equation.

FE650 :idea: :thumbup: 8O 8O

If your lookin for fun, the 650 put the F in FUN.

Just getting the suspension sorted but absolutely love the power increase from my 520.

Son has a new 525 and my thing leaves em wonering which way I went.

Sounds so good with the new Akrapovic slip on.

Everyonr starts their bikes and when mine kicks into life :bm bm bm bm bm... you just know it's a 6fiddy.

I just love it.

550 is almost as fast as 650. 550 Revs quicker and vibrates less. 650 has a flatter torque curve. This is my impressions from test rides. A friend has a 450SX that I have also ridden. 0-60 the 450SX will hang close to both bikes. 60-100 the other 2 will leave the little KTM in the dust. In tough technical hill climbs both Husabergs will keep torquing where the 450 can't pull anymore. If you read this site front to back it seems as if the 550 is a bit more reliable. Tecnically, 450 has a 60MM stroke which equates to modern revvy power, 550 is 70MM which has a spirited yet traditional feel, 650 is around 80MM and is a tractor. I ride an 03 501 which has a 95 MM piston rather than the 100MM of the 550. Rest of the engine (including stroke) is similar to 550. Power is a bit smoother on the 501 down low, mostly due to a much lower compression ratio on the 501. My neighbors KTM 520 is 95X72 and runs a lot like my 501. Despite only 70CC more, KTM 520 with the 72MM stroke is a much better off roader than the 450 due to the better torque.
Dan

hello
i think the 650 kicks out 59 at the rear wheel as standard whereas the 550 kicks out 52 both as standard.

My 650FE compared to my 520 is like a M100 compared to a bottle rocket.

Simons 650 Dyno'd mid 50's. I suppose a fellow might feel a couple horses after more time on the bike, but the lasting impression I had of the 650 was of the torque to blast out of a corner without revving it. 8O I ride in nasty rocks at a snails pace at times, and even the higher compression 550 seems a bit much, hence my love for the 501. Really depends on how you are going to use it. Thats why they make both.
Dan

I know, bringing up an old thread. But I wanted to see it we could get a couple more takes on it. I have ridden the 550 around the block but not in the dirt yet. I plan on it as soon as I get some details sorted.
The 650 I know well.

pollo said:

I know, bringing up an old thread. But I wanted to see it we could get a couple more takes on it. I have ridden the 550 around the block but not in the dirt yet. I plan on it as soon as I get some details sorted.
The 650 I know well.

Click to expand...

The 550 is the most well rounded Berg I've ridden of the 04-08 bikes. Much more pull and speed than the 450 without the love it/hate it anger and immediacy of the snorting 650. It's the middle child in every way.

I know more than one long time husaberg enthusiasts that believe it is the best of the lot in terms of manageable yet serious power and durability. Of course this info is anecdotal and based mostly on perception and frequency of the 550s returning to the shop for maintenance. That said, they didn't sell well here in the US (not that any berg did) so their perceived reliability based on servicing is suspect at best.

I liked the damn thing, but it's stepchild reception became glaring as the con rod for the 550 appears to be the first of what is to be many Husaberg parts on the extinction list. Taffy had some made, and if you own/love it, it would be a good idea to check in with him or investigate prices for custom mades first before buying.

I am dialing in the 550 before I take it to the dirt. New tires and tubes, check valves, change oil, set up..
But first thing I noticed when I rode it around the block was that I needed to turn the throttle a little more down low than what I'm used to on the 650. But there was plenty of power there to tap into and could feel the quicker reving motor. It picks up real quick. I haven't opened it real wide yet.
The 650 has that incremental power delivery because of all the torque. Even the slightest
throttle turn down low is felt.

Hi there guys,
I had clocked up nothing short of 600+ hours on the 04 550 , I have also rode a few 650s 07-08 on short runs.

I enjoyed the 550 very much, as above mentioned, quite a bottom end and a mid range that would stick it to most bikes.

If you are new to offroad bikes and in tight hard going , I would say both the 550/650 , it is not for you, especially with poor throttle control, it will wear you down quickly, until you hone your riding skills. Good however, for open stuff for the thrills of ripping on the throttle, knocking through gears, you cant go wrong.

A more experienced rider on the 550 ,will hone their riding technic , with counter steer , body positioning, suspension set up and brake use into tighter more snottier of corners and more challenging terrain, I found that is where it really comes into play , especially with some pace on ,short shifting off the bottom , it does change direction quite well when its set up , and not being in the right gear or to higher gear can work in your favour at times. In hard going I personally found less rpm , less throttle input , it was really tractable not so fatiguing, and you would ride faster.

The 650 on the few times I rode , I found the bottom end punch bigger again, compared to the 550 , and had a smooth run off the bottom right up to the top end. The 550 seemed like it had a bigger more noticeable hit of mid range power.

The 650 was definitely plenty controllable in tight stuff for me , but there was a slight noticeable difference in handling in tight stuff, some of that may be due to riding a borrowed bike and not getting the time to completely test and adjust my riding style. It was definitely smooth power, but manageable, with speed on up top, it really gets into it , no doubt. It is deceptively fast up top due to the smooth release of power.

Time again, for my purpose, the 550 would be my choice again.

Good stuff from people who have ridden both bikes.

Thanks.

Thanks to everyone who posted their experiences here. I have been wondering for a while what other people thought of the two bikes, and it seems everyone else has had similar experience with the 550 vs the 650 as me.

Off the bat the 550 did feel a lot faster than the 650, and I agree that is because the 550 is a more revvier motor, and I've come to the conclusion that the 550 is actually the best bike for me, because of the balance of power vs torque. But any one of them is a very capable bike in any terrain from supermoto to desert to technical terrain. All my bikes are geared quite tall. My bikes also get changed between SM and offroad trim as my mood changes. On the 501 I run 15/48 gearing and that is currently in offroad trim. I don't change the gear ratios between desert racing and technical riding. The 501 makes enough torque to allow me to still lug her like a tractor on a rocky technical hillclimb, the only drawback with the tall gearing I have is not lots of stalling, but my minimum speed is very high. When I had the 650 in offroad trim, I was running 14/42 gearing, and once again, enough torque to run that gearing even in very technical terrain but with a uncomfortable high speed at idle. But improving my fitness and my skill would allow me to ride at that speed without changing the gearing. For racing I would definitely choose the 550, I think the smaller inertial mass of the engine will make the bike easier to handle and less tiring. In supermoto I found the 650 to have a tendency to go wider under hard acceleration in corners, and I have to fight to keep the bike leaning over through the corner. The 450 I could bang wide open through the same corner without the bike wanting to come upright as the revs go up. Then again, tweaking the suspension will reduce that effect a bit. At the end of the day, both bikes are pretty much equally fast, but the 550 is closer to the 'manageable' part of the spectrum, in some situations 'too much power' is far better than 'waaay too much power'.

I've dabbled with 500 twostrokes and I abandoned that ***** the moment I got my first 650 Berg. Sold the CR500 and bought the 501, and they felt about matched power wise.

I'm planning on getting me a 550 as well sometime...

Another excellent comparo!

I am really glad that I found this topic. I was looking for Fe 650, got Fs 550 put knobbies on. It has rebuilt engine. Now I'm in process of purchasing 08 Fe 550 in showroom condition, just couldn't walk past this one. I am still looking for Fe 650 but I'm not so sad that I haven't found one yet.

I've not ridden the FE650, but I had an XR650R, and now have a Beta 500rs (478cc). I now laugh when people refer to the "500s" (ktm, husky, Beta) as big bores. The only thing the Beta has on the FE550 is topend, but at that point it is really over-rev. Just shift the berg and it keeps going. I could start in 2nd at the base of a huge sand hill and end in 4th on the 550. On the Beta I wasn't even sure it would make it! The Beta feels gutless compared to the 550. I couldn't imagine the FE650 since it is racier than the XR was and 100 cc's more!

Berg has never let me down. I had to push the Beta back to the truck last week

Glad the Berg hasn't sold yet!

i might as well throw another berg in the mix. the early 600. it's like a 550 with more beans. the 650 is easier to control the power than the 600 was.

I just rode them back to back to back on street to get a feel for both motors.
First of all, the 650 in its form with 16/40 and supermoto trim is a lot faster everywhere
than the 550 15/48 in dirt trim. I expected that.

But as for the motors and their delivery:

The 550 revs quicker. We all know that. But for me the 550 is all about the mid range hit. The 650 picks up very strong down low and I cant be sure the 550 would beat it there unless I had the same FS setup on it to test. (I have the extra FS wheels). I'm going with 650 down low for now. In the mid I can believe it would out pull the 650. It gives you everything right there , pulling hard.
On top, its 650.

pollo

pollo said:

I just rode them back to back to back on street to get a feel for both motors.
First of all, the 650 in its form with 16/40 and supermoto trim is a lot faster everywhere
than the 550 15/48 in dirt trim. I expected that.

But as for the motors and their delivery:

The 550 revs quicker. We all know that. But for me the 550 is all about the mid range hit. The 650 picks up very strong down low and I cant be sure the 550 would beat it there unless I had the same FS setup on it. (I have the extra FS wheels). In the mid I can believe it would out pull the 650. It gives you everything right there , pulling hard.
On top, its 650.

pollo

Click to expand...

It makes sense that the short stroke same bore engine will gain rpm faster, even at 87% of the capacity. The shorter distance the piston has to travel gets it back to the power stroke faster at any rpm. Should also be capable of much higher red line, given that other factors such as valve size and porting is equal. Which brings up an interesting aspect of all naturally aspirated engines:

Horsepower is a direct result of an engines ability to flow gasses through it, measured in cft/sec (cubic feet per second).



The higher this number is, the more hp will result. Has little to do with the displacement of an engine, other than larger displacement engines generally are able to flow more, as more cylinders are added etc. But the easiest way to gain horsepower is to increase the size of the carb or FI throttle bodies, enlarge the valves, enlarge, straighten, and polish the intake and exhaust ports, tune the exhaust manifold/pipes/silencer to "extract" exhaust gas.

Rev limits are a result of more factors than just piston speed in ft/sec, a lot of that has to do with the limits of any valve trains design. But with improvement in engineering an engine to be able to achieve higher rpm without valve float etc, an engine with the ability to flow "x" amount of gas with a smaller displacement will rev to the exact rpm where it is moving the same amount of gas through it that a larger displacement engine with the same ability to flow "x" amount of gas at lower rpm, and making maximum equal power at different rpm's. So if the 550 could rev about 1000-1500 rpm higher, it would probably make about the same max horsepower as the 628.

This should help to explain some of the reason why your 550 feels faster in certain regards. You would have to gear them exactly the same to get a real comparison though. The lower gearing of the 550 should give it an advantage until top speeds are reached. The 650 is making more hp because the rev limiter for both engines is the same.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah it would be interesting to see the same gearing response down low with both bikes. Whether the higher reving 550 could holeshot the 650 and its torque. And particlarly the tall 16/38 or 40 gearing.
Enginenumber who prefers the 550 also noted that the 650 punch was bigger down low than the 550.
Similar to the way I felt the motors.
I could see the 650 getting the jump before the 550 gains ground and the 650 then getting away.
But until then I will just need to set them up for a drag race.

berger said:

My opinion. The 550 is a go fast bike, it revs quickly and pulls hard. The 650 is more of a tractor. It revs a little slower and tends to put the power to the ground a little better. The 650 has a faster top speed but will take just alittle longer to get there. The torque and roost factor is way up on the fun meter. If I was going to race I think I would get the 550. For desert and trail riding I think you have to go with the 650. I tend to enjoy riding the 650 more, it really is a fun bike.
You can not compare a 450 to either one of these bikes. It is not even in the equation.

Click to expand...

I quoted Berger here because it mirrors my dirt review today on the 550.
I have put about 300hrs off road on the FE650 15/48 gearing. Today was the first 2 hour ride off road on the FE550 15/48 gearing. I rode fire roads, rocks, and some single track.
I would have to say for the most part the 650 requires a little less effort to ride because of the torque and smoother delivery. The 550 needs a little more throttle control even when ridden at a moderate pace. And that's because it waiting for the crack of the throttle.
The 550 can "Get away" at the crack of the throttle with a burst of energy. I proved that when some guy came up behind me today.
The 650 is no slouch though and can do the same, but there is a point in the mid range of the 550 that feels over the top.
The 550 has less vibration of course. And that feels good.
I was able to turn the 650 quite well. Maybe because I got so used to it. But the 550 did feel a little more nimble in the turns and lighter. My suspension clicker setup felt in range to my liking with the forks at a comfortable height.

So I would say its hard to like the 550 more than the 650 for me. Except maybe racing it or riding it hard. Its very fun there. And I'm not planning to convert my 650 back to enduro. I have my 2016 Ktm 500 as my primary dual sport. The 550 is a great bike and I'm happy to own both of these Husabergs.

pollo