Gents (and girls too, if there are any out there),
I've been playing with the e-starter performance of my 2001 FE400e for close to two years now, and I finally have the solution that works for me.
Uprated ground cable: check.
More powerful starter (Honda CBR I seem to remember): check.
New 7Ahr(?) Yuasa battery: check.
Iridium Denso spark plug: check.
New high voltage cable and plug cap: check.
Endless jetting changes to arrive at an optimum: check.
Revised auto-decompressor and kick-starter 'crescent' mods: check.
Perfect valve clearances: check.
Excellent general mechanical condition: CHECK!
Result: wonderful kick-start performance (second or third kick cold, same hot). Would it e-start? Would it buggery!
Cranking speed was very acceptable, and the mods above allowed the starter to be able to crank for quite a time before you could notice a drop in cranking speed... more than 30s. BUT it wouldn't bloody e-start!!
I pretty much lived with this and had toyed with either the dual battery solution or removing the e-start system completely, but this just seemed like defeat. After all, everything else was just perfect...
Then I spent a week and a half blazzing around Morocco on a rented KTM 400EXC. Very similar performace to the 'berg, but the e-start made life way easier on the knees and allowed me to focus energy on riding rather than starting and riding. So I get back and attack the 'berg...
Measuring actual spark duration (high-voltage probe and osciloscope) gave me a big surprise: 30µs on the kickstart, and 20µs on the e-start. That's microseconds, not a typing error. OK its CDI, but I would still expect something four or five times longer than this!
Reasoning that my SEM stator may be a little tired, I replaced it with a new spare I'd sitting on the shelf awaiting the original to break. Result: 35µs on the kickstart, the same 20µs on the e-start. In effect, no difference! I measured the energy in the spark: around 2mJ. This is slightly less than pathetic when you consider a contemporary automotive ignition system can produce more than 100mJ and a spark duration up to 3ms.
Next I made an interface to sink the output on the original SEM ignition and generate a 5V trigger pulse, which I then used to drive a simple IGBT circuit, which in turn drove a small inductive ignition coil. This coil gives a nominal spark duration of 500µs and an energy around 40mJ. Not making any correction for coil charging for my first test (speeds are low, so the effect on ignition timing is almost nothing... it's a fast coil), I tried cranking the engine to check I was getting a spark... and the bloody thing started on the first compression event!!! I nearly crapped myself as there was no tank on the bike, it had been sitting for three weeks or so unused, it was cold in the garage and the choke was off!!!
So, after playing around for a while to make sure I'd not done anything stupid, I've reached a conclusion that to make my bike work like the way it should, I need more spark energy and more spark duration. Not too surprising given the revalation of the SEM performance...
My next job is obviously to make something that will drive an inductive coil from the SEM ignition trigger. It will in effect be a complete programmable ignition solution, but INDUCTIVE!! A spark duration of 1ms or more should be simple enough, with more than 50mJ from an off-the-shelf Bosch coil. If I'm lucky, I'll maybe find someone has already done the development work for me and I just need to adapt an existing solution.
I'm not saying this will work for everyone, and I have a lingering doubt over the magnetic performance of my rotor, but I for one would like a fully functioning e-start. How about you?
Work in progress.
Cheers... Paul
ps. if anyone has other data on spark duration during cranking that we can compare, please post it here so I can eliminate the possibility of my rotor being a bit pants!!