Joined Aug 2006
22 Posts | 0+
SoCal
Hi Guys,
To make a long story short, after a rebuild, my 2000 fe501e had a vibration that wasn't there before. I've checked every possible cause, and have now worked my way down to having the cases split on my bench.
I suspect it may be that the counter balancer is not aligned properly.
In the shop manual it describes the method of installing and aligning the counter balancer to the crank. Section 11 page 46.
This is the method I used when re assembling the engine.
I've replaced all the recommended bearings, plus some that were suspect.All bearings are good now. All the related counter balancer bearings are fine, no slop, no noise, runout, etc.
The shop manual describes the installation in detail, and involves lining up some markings that are on the gear that is attached to the crank, and markings that are on the gear wheel of the counter balancer.
When the counter balancer is installed this way the weight is not exactly opposed to the heavy end of the crank. It is off by a few degrees. Is this supposed to be aligned like that?
I did this at re assembly, thinking that the engineers who designed this thing and the guys that wrote the shop manual, knew what they were talking about. And, maybe it is ok that the weights are not opposed exactly at "180 degrees". Thinking that maybe there are some forces from the combustion explosion that are being compensated for.
If I assemble the counter balancer without using the marks or the method described in the manual, that is, aligning it such that the weight on the counter balancer is exactly opposed the the heavy end of the crank, then the marks don't line up.
Ignoring the marks on the gears, common sense tells me that the weight of the counter balancer and the heavy end of the crank should be exactly opposed, an the counter balancer weight should not be off of that alignment by a few degrees.
Is there an error in the manual? An error in the way the markings were put on the gears?
This has me perplexed, and I don't want to assemble it until I'm sure I'm doing it right.
Any body have any pictures of this assembly?
Thanks,
Jim
To make a long story short, after a rebuild, my 2000 fe501e had a vibration that wasn't there before. I've checked every possible cause, and have now worked my way down to having the cases split on my bench.
I suspect it may be that the counter balancer is not aligned properly.
In the shop manual it describes the method of installing and aligning the counter balancer to the crank. Section 11 page 46.
This is the method I used when re assembling the engine.
I've replaced all the recommended bearings, plus some that were suspect.All bearings are good now. All the related counter balancer bearings are fine, no slop, no noise, runout, etc.
The shop manual describes the installation in detail, and involves lining up some markings that are on the gear that is attached to the crank, and markings that are on the gear wheel of the counter balancer.
When the counter balancer is installed this way the weight is not exactly opposed to the heavy end of the crank. It is off by a few degrees. Is this supposed to be aligned like that?
I did this at re assembly, thinking that the engineers who designed this thing and the guys that wrote the shop manual, knew what they were talking about. And, maybe it is ok that the weights are not opposed exactly at "180 degrees". Thinking that maybe there are some forces from the combustion explosion that are being compensated for.
If I assemble the counter balancer without using the marks or the method described in the manual, that is, aligning it such that the weight on the counter balancer is exactly opposed the the heavy end of the crank, then the marks don't line up.
Ignoring the marks on the gears, common sense tells me that the weight of the counter balancer and the heavy end of the crank should be exactly opposed, an the counter balancer weight should not be off of that alignment by a few degrees.
Is there an error in the manual? An error in the way the markings were put on the gears?
This has me perplexed, and I don't want to assemble it until I'm sure I'm doing it right.
Any body have any pictures of this assembly?
Thanks,
Jim