This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Closed Cartridge Impressions and Springs Question

Joined Jun 2009
51 Posts | 0+
Quito - Ecuador
Hi: I just bought a 2011 Husaberg FE 450.

I am thrilled and positively impressed with the new CC forks. They are way better. Much more precised that the OC forks. They are also smooth enough for enduros (I even had to stiffened them a little trought clicks - 8 clicks out instead of 12 clicks out as the come from factory).

I rode some trails which I usually do and my feelings where those.
That´s for any of you who wonders about the CC forks. They are great.

I will like to ask if anybody knows if the stock springs that come in the 2011 bergs (Fe models) are the right ones for my weight, since I felt the bike was a bit wallow and soft, compromising the agility of the bike compared to my FE 450 2009 which had the stock springs as whell but felt more agile.

I weight 165 pounds without gear (so I guess around 190 pounds with gear).

Also, if anybody will tell me the correct or suggested click settings in the whole suspension for enduro riding in an advanced level (which I ride), I will appreciate it a lot.

Greetings.

Sebastian
Husaberg FE 450 2011
 
Keep in mind that the 09 had 19mm clamps and the 11 has 22mm. This is a noticeable difference in turning. Stock springs should work fine at your weight up to a certain speed and trail. Remember that adding compression also increases dampening to a degree. Just set your static sag and check rider. With 22mm clamps I would stay 30-35mm static and dont be afraid to turn those clickers. Make adjustments 4 or so clicks at a time to really feel what the affect is.
 
I set rider sag to 102 mm (without gear). I don´t understand de logic for static sag (between 30 -35mm) since this should differ from one bike to another considering each has a differente rider sag set. Could you explain this to me?
Ok, I will keep the actual springs and if I understood you OK I don´t need to be afraid to click in the compression in the forks even beyond 8 ckicks in-out?

Thanks for answering me.

Greetings.

Sebastian
 
You set static sag and then check rider sag. If you set static and your rider sag is too great your spring is too soft. If you set static and your rider sag is too little then your spring is too stiff.
 
Ok I now understand about the static sag and rider sag.

I have a question, the manual says to go around 105 mm rider sag, but a friend at factory connection told me to run 120 mm rider sag.

Which one would be the best in this bike???

2011 FE 450

And, thas someone would recommend the clicker setting for this bike???

165 pound (without gear), advanced enduro rider (trails, scramble circuits mainly).

Greetings.

Sebastian
 
I run 119mm rider and my static is around 43mm. I have my suspension done by Genuine Dirt Rider in North Carolina, US. So yes I would run that sag but you have to get the spring right as well. I'm 247 lbs and run 5.2 front springs and an 8.4 on the rear.
 
70DEGREERACINGLLC said:
You set static sag and then check rider sag. If you set static and your rider sag is too great your spring is too soft. If you set static and your rider sag is too little then your spring is too stiff.
Shouldn't that be reversed? Shouldn't you set rider sag, and then check static sag? Maybe I don't get it... :?:
 
Nope, static sag first. The bike has to stand on it's own without rider influence. Then when the rider & gear are added the suspension needs to work for that added weight.

All know is that usually I sit on a dirt bike and it just kinda laughs at me...so is that all ya got lady? :lol:
 
then I must be doing it wrong!

I set the race sag (me on it) first so I know the finite setting for me. after all 115 to 100mm is more finite than 25-30mm.

If you work on the basis like I do that it took a long while to realise that 115mm made it a jalopy and 105mm the best handling bike I ever rode tell me how I'm going to tell whether the bike is right at either 27 or 29mm of "on wheels" sag.

race sag is part the handling and rider sag can never be. handling and suspension MUST go together if you're going to do the job right.

just my opinion of course!

regards

Taffy
 
Taffy: Are you telling me to go for 105 mm instead of 115mm???? Are you telling me to ignore what the guys at factory connection say about it? I will trancribe part of an email they sent me?

When I was at 105 mm I felt the bike hard on the back but handled whell. I haven´t tried 115 mm yet.

Factory Connection guys says:
"We find the bike tracks better and rear end is a little high STD. 115 - 120mm is our typical range.
105mm I think is too much preload on shock spring for most riders."

Let me know your impressions.

Maybe I go back to 105 and set the clickers softer.

I want the bike to feel as lighter as I could possible can.

Do you have clicker settings to recommend??? Remember is a 2011 FE 450.

Greetings.

SC
 
I don't have any great settings for the bike yet. I've done 6 MX laps and a 3.5 hour enduro in which I didn't stop to ask the way....

anyway, i work differently I'm afraid.

I try to get the best suspension I can get using springs and tweaks of the clickers. I will also ride with bad suspension to sort the handling while parts are on order etc. I'll also change fork heights for tracking etc.

a good example is if I have 110 sag on the rear and the front washes out on slow tight corners even though the spring feels right. I then go to 105 and the front grips again but now the ride is harsh. that's what dropping or raising the forks is for! this allows you to keep the pitch of the bike where you want it at all times.

suspension first
pitch second
handling third

you won't find this advice from anyone else you ever met but it's my conclusion after all these years.

regards

Taffy
 
Taffy: Let me try to understand you.

You are telling me to:
1.- Find the correcto suspension settings (right springs, clickers, etc) in terms of handling, stability, confort, etc?, the,
2.- Play with the forks to correct problems such as washing, unproper steering with the front, understeering, etc?

That´s what I understood.

Anyway I will appreciatte your comments in the sag matter. Which one do you recommend and why???' (closer to 120 or closer to 105).

Seb
 
scisneros said:
Taffy: Let me try to understand you.

You are telling me to:
1.- Find the correcto suspension settings (right springs, clickers, etc) in terms of handling, stability, confort, etc?, the,
2.- Play with the forks to correct problems such as washing, unproper steering with the front, understeering, etc?

That´s what I understood.

Anyway I will appreciatte your comments in the sag matter. Which one do you recommend and why???' (closer to 120 or closer to 105).

Seb
the best springs and sags are only right for the weight of the rider. you and I could be 13 and 14 stones and still be on the same spring just before one of us went up one and one went down one but if we were on the same spring we would have different preloads to get the race sags right. so what you quote at the beginning of this thread is to me, completely wrong and makes me question what the man knows.

the first pita-pata of your suspension is dictated entirely by the amount of pre-load, as a simple rule: small stuff like a hard pack dirt rode that is s-m-o-o-t-h will drill you if you have a lighter spring than you need that is pre-loaded. always fit springs that are very lightly pre-loaded to get what you want. you boys call it 'trail-trash'.

so I set the suspension for comfort and also as I'm doing that I'm changing the pitch everytime I ride aren't I. If I loosen the comp on the front and take some pre-load off then when I brake I'm going to transfer more weight over the front. this actually has a self-perpetuating effect just like water being carried in a bowl.

you can do the above to your fork and only see a 5mm difference but the weight transfer will be big which turns that 5mm into 10 and that 10 becomes 15 and so forth. that changes the grip on the front and makes it better as a rule.

so best suspension (not handling) first. every week change the settings to get what you want until you are comfortable and happy with it.

then you have to combat the yawing. yawing is a result of weight transfer leaving a corner and the resistance to the rear end sitting with a thing called anti-squat. you want the weight to transfer back but be held from drooping yer arse by the anti-squat. yaw is also affected by how high the clamps sit. if the clamps are high you are changing the balance and the dip. you'll squat at the rear but get no dip under braking. I use the height of my forks to check the correct yaw.

handling, well as far as handling goes this is more difficult. the nearer the front wheel to the centre point through the head stem = the less control you have on steering. so 22mm offset means less input and 14mm means huge input.

best way of describing it is 22mm = your car steering =2 turns of the wheel to turn anywhere.
14mm = like a indy car, just twitch the steering and the bike throws the wheel away from under you and the bike drops like a stone. bad news is that you have to hold the steering with your eyes on sticks as you continually ride in and out of that rut over correcting to the left and then to the right and then back to the left and so on. makes you look a cock!

you might add balance as part of all this. short WB means a lot more yaw and long wheelbase less. rear wheel back equals more dive on the front when braking and less grip as well accelerating. and you can guess the reverse.

as far as handling goes and the chassis (not suspension here) all you do is play with yokes (TCs) and the anti-squat.

you have to revisit stuff as well so If you change the gearing and the rear wheel shoots forwards well you just changed the balance. viking says that the difference between a wheel at the front of the slot and at the rear of it is a whole spring - 2KG. that's just moving the rear wheel.

I've done a thread on handling you may wish to look at I think I called it 'Handling for Enduros'.

I'm going back to reading about Frank Luke again - awesome pilot.... when you think of the shyte that Hollywood has made and there's a story that doesn't even need changing...

regards

Taffy
 
Wholly sh.. Taffy: You got me all messed up here. Let me clarify to you a couple of things first.

a) I know nothing about suspensions, I am just trying to set my new bike the best I can with your help,
b) I am not a native english speaker, so words like yoke, and yawing are difficult for me to understand.
c) I will appreciate if you could explaing to me the basics only and give me YOUR recommendations on SAG, CLAMPS ON THE FORKS, CLICKER SETTINGS, BACK WHEEL POSITION, etc to get the best out of my bike with my ALMOST EMPTY KNOWLEDGE.

1st.- I want to try my stock springs (no way to buy stiffer ones here in Ecuador), and they are almost in the limit to hold my weight and still be able the get the proper rider sag (but with lot´s of preload - I guess this is bad). So unless I can´t get a great feel for the bike I will wait until putting new stiffer springs which is problem for me to get them here, but if it´s a must I will.

2nd.- You say: "you can do the above to your fork and only see a 5mm difference but the weight transfer will be big which turns that 5mm into 10 and that 10 becomes 15 and so forth. that changes the grip on the front and makes it better as a rule. " What are you actually recommending me here??? Set the front clickers soft??? Plase rephrase this point again so I can understand. (Sorry again for my lack of a good english and suspension basics understanding).

3rd.- I have a 22mm offset and ALSO not going to change that (I trust that the factory in this matter), so what do you recommend in terms of CLAMPS IN THE FORKS (lower them, or raise them), and BACK WHEEL (to throw it back of forward)??? I understand that if you lower your clamps you get a better grip (because of weight transfer to the front, but loose in instability and head shacke could appear). I understand that pushing the rear wheel back gives more trail, less grip in the back and more weight tranfer to the front, but you tend to turn worst???

4th.- You say: "as far as handling goes and the chassis (not suspension here) all you do is play with yokes (TCs) and the anti-squat.". What is YOKES? WHAT IS TC´s? How do I play with them.

So I am just a mess right now.

I have a 109 mm rider sag. Forks are set in the third line in the clamps and the rear wheel is very close to the swingarm. Clickers are: Forks (Comp 18, Reb 16), Shocks (LS Comp 20, Hs Comp 2 Turns, Reb 15).

Haven´t try this settings yet.

The ones I did try where:
105 mm rider sag. Forks in the same third line in the clamps. Real whell was still very close to the swingarms. And clickers where: Fork (comp 8, reb 14,). Shock (LS comp 15, HS Comp 1 Turn, Reb 12). Bike felt agile enough, some head shacke in bumps when going fast. Back was stiff and hitted hard. Front was stiff in hard bumps. Bike turned good.

Your comments please Taffy.

Seb
 
You cant set race sag first. You can set race sag with any spring. This is the reason for the relationship between static sag and race sag. Set your rider sag at 120mm and if your static is between 40-45mm your good. Try your forks with the second line at the top of triple clamps. Go ride and adjust your clickers according to what you feel. Write down where they are now and what you do and how it felt. Dont get to caught up in this its not that hard. Your weight should work with stock springs. Just try this and see.
 

Register CTA

Register on Husaberg Forum! This sidebar will go away, and you will see fewer ads.

Recent Discussions