D dougn1 Joined Oct 2003 170 Posts | 3+ USA san jose Discussion Starter Nov 5, 2008 #1 what's different about the valve train between these two engines? the reason i ask is my 96 went for several hundred hours without a hiccup, aluminum camwheel and all....why didn't the 96 tulip the valves?
what's different about the valve train between these two engines? the reason i ask is my 96 went for several hundred hours without a hiccup, aluminum camwheel and all....why didn't the 96 tulip the valves?
O oyk Joined Jan 2005 344 Posts | 0+ kavala, greece Nov 5, 2008 #2 dual valve springs instead of conical= less force on to the valves. plus the camshaft has less brutal profile. actually early 1996 models and later 1996 models had a different cylinder head+oil pump.
dual valve springs instead of conical= less force on to the valves. plus the camshaft has less brutal profile. actually early 1996 models and later 1996 models had a different cylinder head+oil pump.
D dougn1 Joined Oct 2003 170 Posts | 3+ USA san jose Discussion Starter Nov 5, 2008 #3 i thought i recall only one valve spring on the 501. also....are you sure the cam profile of the 470 is worse?
i thought i recall only one valve spring on the 501. also....are you sure the cam profile of the 470 is worse?
O oyk Joined Jan 2005 344 Posts | 0+ kavala, greece Nov 5, 2008 #4 2 springs. if your motor is an earlier 1996 (44mm water pump, 10mm rocker shafts) then yes the cam profile is milder. the shoulders are more round. somewhere i have a comparison photo i think...
2 springs. if your motor is an earlier 1996 (44mm water pump, 10mm rocker shafts) then yes the cam profile is milder. the shoulders are more round. somewhere i have a comparison photo i think...