- Joined
- Jun 13, 2007
- Messages
- 3,871
- Location
- south east WA Australia
spent a couple of hours playing with an assembled cartridge with BC bleed in a big water trough.
water is different to oil and there is no way this testing replicates what happens when a 650 berg has to slow from 90 to 20km/hr over 30 or 40 1 to 2 foot deep braking bumps. probably several orders of magnitude closer to the truth than using air.
But, its fun and someone might be interested to know what happened.
first observation is that a lot of water comes out of the DU bushing. similar to that expelled by a 0.4mm BC bleed.
second looking at the lack of movement of face shims on the BV there is no way that you can replicate the speeds and forces at work while riding. unless you may happen to have devoted your life to rapid to and fro movements of a small diam slippery rod.
does water come out the bc bleed and the DU bushing all the time the rod is in motion? NO. even with an unaltered rideable cartridge BC flow can be reversed.
just for fun I changed BC bleed sizes, built different BVs and MVs and tried to force cavitation. a very soft BV and a stiff MV will reverse flow through the BC bleed on compression. with a fair bit of trial and error I found the turning point and could alter the parameters with the BV clicker.
again this is in no way a conclusive answer to efectiveness of a BC bleed as its not in the bike hammering along over nasty bumps. But its good enough for me to continue with the idea of a BC bleed and was lots of fun.
other possible anti-cavitation advantages of the bleed include circulating more of the oil to help dissapate heat, perhaps purging of any emulsifed fliud and of course any closing of the BV clicker raises cartridge pressure.
there are significant disadvantages as cavitation is now possible on rebound. call it refill not keeping up or whatever you like it produces the same thump on compression after a rebound event.
if you don't believe in cavitation then you must be happy right? so just stay happy.
I don't care if its cavitation lack of refil, poor recovery charachteristics or an ancient gypsy curse bestowed apon poor Wim Peters' family years ago. the less of "it" that my forks have the better they work and the faster I go. KYbs with 32mm cartridge bores 430mm long on the same bike to not have "it". they can tolerate a softer BV, stiffer MV to hold up in punishment without being harsh and still not have "it" I'll hazard a bet showas wouldn't either.
comparing to the KYBs theWP cartridge is only about 390mm long and has approx 28mm bore, the mid valve piston is a hydrodynamic nightmare and too thin to allow smooth flow on compression, the refil path through the BV is also rediculously turbulant and restrictive. these things can be improved.
with every reduction in cavitation oops i mean "it" the rebound becomes more effective and needs a couple of days to sort out, usually 3 or 4 stack changes to get it right.
3-4 days a week average has been 6-7 days/ week the last 2 months. Pretty sure that i can tell the diference between too much/too little rebound and "it". the forks can exhibit both charachteristics if agrivated long enough, the tricky bit is pin pointing which is which.
but thats just for my bike on my track with me on it, except for the water trough thing which is for no bike, may not apply or be even noticable to anyone else. if your happy with the forks then lifes good.........no? fancy some showas? or an ohlins TTX cartridge to put in the WP pasta utensils......
have fun on the bikes
regards
Bushie
water is different to oil and there is no way this testing replicates what happens when a 650 berg has to slow from 90 to 20km/hr over 30 or 40 1 to 2 foot deep braking bumps. probably several orders of magnitude closer to the truth than using air.
But, its fun and someone might be interested to know what happened.
first observation is that a lot of water comes out of the DU bushing. similar to that expelled by a 0.4mm BC bleed.
second looking at the lack of movement of face shims on the BV there is no way that you can replicate the speeds and forces at work while riding. unless you may happen to have devoted your life to rapid to and fro movements of a small diam slippery rod.
does water come out the bc bleed and the DU bushing all the time the rod is in motion? NO. even with an unaltered rideable cartridge BC flow can be reversed.
just for fun I changed BC bleed sizes, built different BVs and MVs and tried to force cavitation. a very soft BV and a stiff MV will reverse flow through the BC bleed on compression. with a fair bit of trial and error I found the turning point and could alter the parameters with the BV clicker.
again this is in no way a conclusive answer to efectiveness of a BC bleed as its not in the bike hammering along over nasty bumps. But its good enough for me to continue with the idea of a BC bleed and was lots of fun.
other possible anti-cavitation advantages of the bleed include circulating more of the oil to help dissapate heat, perhaps purging of any emulsifed fliud and of course any closing of the BV clicker raises cartridge pressure.
there are significant disadvantages as cavitation is now possible on rebound. call it refill not keeping up or whatever you like it produces the same thump on compression after a rebound event.
if you don't believe in cavitation then you must be happy right? so just stay happy.
I don't care if its cavitation lack of refil, poor recovery charachteristics or an ancient gypsy curse bestowed apon poor Wim Peters' family years ago. the less of "it" that my forks have the better they work and the faster I go. KYbs with 32mm cartridge bores 430mm long on the same bike to not have "it". they can tolerate a softer BV, stiffer MV to hold up in punishment without being harsh and still not have "it" I'll hazard a bet showas wouldn't either.
comparing to the KYBs theWP cartridge is only about 390mm long and has approx 28mm bore, the mid valve piston is a hydrodynamic nightmare and too thin to allow smooth flow on compression, the refil path through the BV is also rediculously turbulant and restrictive. these things can be improved.
with every reduction in cavitation oops i mean "it" the rebound becomes more effective and needs a couple of days to sort out, usually 3 or 4 stack changes to get it right.
3-4 days a week average has been 6-7 days/ week the last 2 months. Pretty sure that i can tell the diference between too much/too little rebound and "it". the forks can exhibit both charachteristics if agrivated long enough, the tricky bit is pin pointing which is which.
but thats just for my bike on my track with me on it, except for the water trough thing which is for no bike, may not apply or be even noticable to anyone else. if your happy with the forks then lifes good.........no? fancy some showas? or an ohlins TTX cartridge to put in the WP pasta utensils......
have fun on the bikes
regards
Bushie