Will it hold together?

husabutt · Dec 9, 2005

BOSS said:
Husabutt you know to ask the Boss!

210-257-01

BOSS you are da BOSSest!!

Just trying to gather any elusive part numbers that are not in the "Book" for Taffy's owners doc turned Wiki

JoeUSA · Dec 9, 2005

husabutt said:
Thanks Joe!!!

I didn't see that in a 01 parts manual or a 01-02 combined manual that I have. Is yours a 02 only manual?

If anyone has a kit part number I will take that also

Yes, it is a 2002 manual I downloaded from the Mother site.

Joe

BOSS · Dec 9, 2005

I must say joeUSA you are a very valuable resource your self.

have a good day!
Happy holidays!

husabutt · Dec 9, 2005

BOSS said:
I must say joeUSA you are a very valuable resource your self.

have a good day!
Happy holidays!

Joe is The Man

and Rick you are definitely "The Boss"

and I am the Bu.........never mind (why did I pick that name

)

Happy Holidays,

Eric

LINEAWEAVER · Dec 9, 2005

Enginehardware said:
If you want to remove the balancer complete go for a NJ2206ECP/C3 and a 7,4mm spacer ring on the left side, cut the sprocket away from the balancer drive shaft, axial freeplay 0,6-0,8mm on the cranksaft.

Example of above mentioned modification:

Lineaweaver

Dale

dsducati · Dec 10, 2005

Dale,
Why is it necessary to turn the gear teeth off the intermediate shaft? Oiling, HP, or is simply because the made up spacer has an OD large enough to interfere?
Dan

LINEAWEAVER · Dec 10, 2005

dsducati said:
Dale,
Why is it necessary to turn the gear teeth off the intermediate shaft? Oiling, HP, or is simply because the made up spacer has an OD large enough to interfere?
Dan

Hi Dan,

One could certainly argue in favor of reduced sump windage, less gear rattle and / or reduced weight / moment of Inertia.

However, for me, such simply represented an additional touch of professionalism.

My theory:
Without a balancer to drive, Why have drive teeth?

Anal you say? Indeed.

Best Regards,
Dale

dsducati · Dec 11, 2005

Well said. One last question. When adding weight to achieve the 70% balance factor you use, how does the total inertia of the rebalanced crank compare to the original inertia with the balancer?
dan

LINEAWEAVER · Dec 11, 2005

dsducati said:
Well said. One last question. When adding weight to achieve the 70% balance factor you use, how does the total inertia of the rebalanced crank compare to the original inertia with the balancer?
dan

Hi Dan,

Truth be told I never calculated the overall change in Moment Of Inertia. However, from both dynamometer and field testing their is no perceptible difference regarding engine braking and / or traction.

Reduced clatter and vibration along with sharper throttle response have been reported.

I know, I know...
"No difference regarding engine braking and / or traction" and "sharper throttle response" are contradictory. I am simply passing on end user perception.

Best Regards,
Dale

Taffy · Dec 11, 2005

so i hope that it's agreed that an un-balanced engine without the balancer produces no significant power change on it's own. balancing the crank w/o the counter balancer merely gives a better ride but most people know that energy thrown into the frame and footrests is not good if we haven't bothered and we tend to draw the conclusion that "it's wasteful".

regards

Taffy

Will it hold together?

Help Support Husaberg:

husabutt

JoeUSA

BOSS

husabutt

LINEAWEAVER

dsducati

LINEAWEAVER

dsducati

LINEAWEAVER

Taffy

Similar threads

Register CTA

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions