apologies for not getting back to this sooner
the reduced effort required to turn the engine with a DVSK is due to the reduced peak and average force not the seated force. so purely in the interests of "clearing things up" .....
it seems Taffy is incapable of measuring seated forces I tried to tell him his figures didn't add up in 2009 and got told I was being "far too anal" ahem cough ..... so to be fair to the mechanically challenged ... WITHOUT
even measuring anything consider this
claim 1 OEM seated pressure is 140 LBS... wrong (also claimed on site"taffmeisters UK" to be 100Lbs .. so which is it?)
claim 2 TOFFEE DVSK reduces seated pressure by 40% ... also wrong
Taffy said:
the seated pressure of the original valve spring is 140LB, the DVSK I supply are on 87LB when compressed to 36mm which is where you want them. my supplier changed the specs of them without any warning, so much so that I had three old style couldn't get even one more kit - a fourth one to make up a kit, and ended up keeping them for myself.
to keep this impartial and try to avoid another paranoid delusion about "attacks" i'll just put up some links with info from people who can actually measure stuff.
lineaweaver
http://www.thumpertalk.com/topic/161304 ... l-springs/
DJH et al
http://ktmtalk.com/index.php?showtopic= ... lve+guides http://ktmtalk.com/index.php?showtopic= ... ed+tension
Dr_C
http://www.husaberg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=9366 http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... e&start=15
Faust
http://www.husaberg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11115
there are others Plus my results but i'll stay out of it because it will be taken the wrong way :cry:
ok so if the OEM seated force is 100 lbs as claimed on taffys site then a 40% reduction in seated force is 60lbs. if its 140Lbs as hes claimed previously then a 40% reduction in seated force is 84 lbs (just over actual OEM seated force)
the actual seated force of the oem springs in a stock head with stock valves is measured by many at between 72 and 82 pounds. 40% reduction of that gives you 43 - 50 lbs which is where valve bounce starts and you don't want that :wink: minimum safe seated pressure is 60lbs.
the best a vendor of a DVSK that fits in our engines can currently claim is that the seated force is about the same as OEM and that is what most of them do.
the reason the conicals break is because over time they get shorter and their seated force isn't enough to stop resonating to death, thats why failure can be avoided by monitoring the seated force and adding preload to increase or maintain it.
FWIW the damping effect of the 2 springs in a DVSK rubbing together means you can run an even lower seated force than with a conical before you get bounce and standing waves in the springs. if you want to take advantage of that though then you need a set of springs that are short enough to install at that reduced preload.
the question ol taff will be asking is why then do dual valve springs reduce valve wear if the seated pressure is the same? .............. work that out and you'l be able to base a sales pitch on honesty and fact. he'll aslo have to admit to being wrong in this thread
http://www.husaberg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=14997 I can explain it in numpty terms if you like Taffy, give me a call and have your credit card ready my rate is $1000 a day or part thereof :twisted: