- Joined
- Dec 15, 2003
- Messages
- 587
- Location
- Where ever we park the motorhome, USA
We were riding in Moab, Utah last week. The terrain requires alot of clutch work (slipping/feathering) to negotiate the rocks/ boulders. My clutch always seems to get very hot , very quickly, then it starts squealing. So when it started sqealing, I decided to try adding 4 ounces extra oil in the engine. The clutch noises immediately stopped. Yesterday, I was changing the oil, and I decided to try 1.250 liters instead of the usual 1 liter. After a hard 30 mile ride in the rocks in 110 F heat, the engine seemed to not be getting as hot as usual, and clutch didn't make any noises. So I was wondering if anyone else had experimented with their oil level, or does everyone just follow the manual on these things?
The reason that I got this idea was because my son's KTM 85sx requires more oil in the transmission than the manual specifies. In fact, at KTMtalk, it is common knowledge that the manuals have errors regarding oil levels. The 85sx manual specifies 300cc oil transmission oil, but the clutch overheats and squeals (like my bike). Even most of the KTM dealers know the 85sx requires 500cc of oil to prevent premature clutch failure. So, I was wondering, if KTM can make that type of error, cannot Husaberg also make the same mistake. Didn't one overzealous engineer cause the first prototype bike to grenade (in front of the investors none the less) after he removed an excessive amount of material from the stator. How minute of a performance gain was achieved by that endeaver. Oil drag certainly has the potential to be a larger drain of h.p. Maybe some engineer specified too small amount of oil in an attempt to reduce oil drag in the engine, at the price of a shortened engine life. Could this be the cause of the unexplained main bearing failures?
I plan on increasing the oil level to 1.4 liters at the next oil change. I want to continue riding with 1.25 to see if I can find any performance disadvantage vs using 1 liter. So far, by today's ride performance, I would have to honestly say the engine ran better today than last weekend. I expected no performance difference, so I doubt that I would have imagined the difference that I felt. The clutch definitely was smoother and more consistant today, and best of all, it was silent all day.
Any thoughts or opinions on this? 8O
The reason that I got this idea was because my son's KTM 85sx requires more oil in the transmission than the manual specifies. In fact, at KTMtalk, it is common knowledge that the manuals have errors regarding oil levels. The 85sx manual specifies 300cc oil transmission oil, but the clutch overheats and squeals (like my bike). Even most of the KTM dealers know the 85sx requires 500cc of oil to prevent premature clutch failure. So, I was wondering, if KTM can make that type of error, cannot Husaberg also make the same mistake. Didn't one overzealous engineer cause the first prototype bike to grenade (in front of the investors none the less) after he removed an excessive amount of material from the stator. How minute of a performance gain was achieved by that endeaver. Oil drag certainly has the potential to be a larger drain of h.p. Maybe some engineer specified too small amount of oil in an attempt to reduce oil drag in the engine, at the price of a shortened engine life. Could this be the cause of the unexplained main bearing failures?
I plan on increasing the oil level to 1.4 liters at the next oil change. I want to continue riding with 1.25 to see if I can find any performance disadvantage vs using 1 liter. So far, by today's ride performance, I would have to honestly say the engine ran better today than last weekend. I expected no performance difference, so I doubt that I would have imagined the difference that I felt. The clutch definitely was smoother and more consistant today, and best of all, it was silent all day.
Any thoughts or opinions on this? 8O