I know for sure I'm getting a 2011 now over even a smoker of a deal I can get on a 2010 450.
The big thing is whether to get the 390 or the 450.
I live in Vermont, USA and ride super technical, steep, wet, rooty, rocky terrain.
I recently rode a 2010 390 and 450 back to back but only down a dirt road. They both had auto-clutches. The 390 was in the standard map setting and the 450 was in the mellow setting. I liked the 450 more as it lofted the front wheel much easier as I came out of a corner. That might be because my last bike was an 09' 300XC-W.
I am an expert rider and have had everything from little 2-strokes to a 640 adventure. I used to ride an XR 600 on the same trails I rode the 300 on and actually had a blast on it. So, I can handle a big bore for sure.
BUT! I keep reading reviews of the 390 that spell it out to be a trials wonderkind. Oh yeah, I used to ride a trials bike too. I'm fit enough. I raced bicycles and still ride a minimum of 2 hrs a day.
My two favorite bikes were a 2005 Kawasaki KDX 220 for it's unbeatable handling in the super tight eastern woods.
And my 98' XR 400 for how tractable to power was, even though it was a softie. It chugged away anywhere.
I guess my 3rd would be that 300. That thing ran awesome and had enough power but it lacked the four stroke torque.
On a super steep climb that was too technical for all out attack, it would move it's way up fine but there was some chug lacking in there.
I have owned a 450. a 2007 Husky TE. It was good. kinda like a modern XR, but the jetting never made me happy no matter what I tried and, well, it was like an xr...... Heavy!
One friend I have has a 390 and he is a pro racer. He loves it. I have never ridden with him though. My closest buddy that I ride with once a week thinks i'm cut out for the 450 and I don't deny that I can handle it. I just have to make sure cause $10k plus is no joking matter
Thanks
The big thing is whether to get the 390 or the 450.
I live in Vermont, USA and ride super technical, steep, wet, rooty, rocky terrain.
I recently rode a 2010 390 and 450 back to back but only down a dirt road. They both had auto-clutches. The 390 was in the standard map setting and the 450 was in the mellow setting. I liked the 450 more as it lofted the front wheel much easier as I came out of a corner. That might be because my last bike was an 09' 300XC-W.
I am an expert rider and have had everything from little 2-strokes to a 640 adventure. I used to ride an XR 600 on the same trails I rode the 300 on and actually had a blast on it. So, I can handle a big bore for sure.
BUT! I keep reading reviews of the 390 that spell it out to be a trials wonderkind. Oh yeah, I used to ride a trials bike too. I'm fit enough. I raced bicycles and still ride a minimum of 2 hrs a day.
My two favorite bikes were a 2005 Kawasaki KDX 220 for it's unbeatable handling in the super tight eastern woods.
And my 98' XR 400 for how tractable to power was, even though it was a softie. It chugged away anywhere.
I guess my 3rd would be that 300. That thing ran awesome and had enough power but it lacked the four stroke torque.
On a super steep climb that was too technical for all out attack, it would move it's way up fine but there was some chug lacking in there.
I have owned a 450. a 2007 Husky TE. It was good. kinda like a modern XR, but the jetting never made me happy no matter what I tried and, well, it was like an xr...... Heavy!
One friend I have has a 390 and he is a pro racer. He loves it. I have never ridden with him though. My closest buddy that I ride with once a week thinks i'm cut out for the 450 and I don't deny that I can handle it. I just have to make sure cause $10k plus is no joking matter
Thanks