- Joined
- May 4, 2005
- Messages
- 190
- Location
- Sacramento California
I've hinted at this project in the past and now it's becoming a reality. What insanity am I up to now? The engine in question is another 1996 Vintage FC600.
See my old thread for the other 600 I've done (http://husaberg.org/mechanical/16703-husaberg-ktm-hybrid-engine.html)
This one, however, is taking the insanity to the next level. As such it's out of the realm of what I'm able to accomplish in my garage. With the popularity of big bore KTM engines and the similarity between the KTM RFS and the original Husaberg jugs, I decided that I'd contact Travis at Thumper Racing to do the work. He bored the cylinder and engine cases and pressed in a cast iron sleeve honed to work with a Wossner Husaberg 550 flat top piston (100mm bore diameter). He also had Carillo make a custom rebuildable rod matching the stock length, width, etc. He even had a custom Titanium wrist pin that I suspect was for another project but went unused so I got it for a steal.
Then I purchased some ceramic bearings from Microblue including cam, crank, and a few other bearings while I also had them run the piston, rings, and rod kit (rod, big end bearing, and crank pin) through their process as well. I even had them process the cam follower rollers, pins and needles. I figure this'll be a really good test of the Microblue process given the lack of an oil pump in this engine and a few of these are common trouble spots.
Well, it's now time to put the engine together (now that I've saved up some funds from kicking the beer and firecrackers habit) and, once again, I'm in contact with Thumper Racing to do the work.
Going to have them install larger valves in the head along with a little runner porting, port the combustion chamber for a reasonable compression ratio, bore the carb, balance the crank, and perform most of the final assembly.
...aaaannd I finally get to the point of my post. In talking with Travis, he is recommending a 58% balance factor. Since this engine is destined to reside in a 1996 chassis, does this balance factor sound reasonable? I've heard of balance factors between 60% and 80% being used in the newer '00-'08 chassis and my hope is that the '96 frame is similar enough to warrant an equally similar BF. What say you, the collective engine building geniuses.
See my old thread for the other 600 I've done (http://husaberg.org/mechanical/16703-husaberg-ktm-hybrid-engine.html)
This one, however, is taking the insanity to the next level. As such it's out of the realm of what I'm able to accomplish in my garage. With the popularity of big bore KTM engines and the similarity between the KTM RFS and the original Husaberg jugs, I decided that I'd contact Travis at Thumper Racing to do the work. He bored the cylinder and engine cases and pressed in a cast iron sleeve honed to work with a Wossner Husaberg 550 flat top piston (100mm bore diameter). He also had Carillo make a custom rebuildable rod matching the stock length, width, etc. He even had a custom Titanium wrist pin that I suspect was for another project but went unused so I got it for a steal.
Then I purchased some ceramic bearings from Microblue including cam, crank, and a few other bearings while I also had them run the piston, rings, and rod kit (rod, big end bearing, and crank pin) through their process as well. I even had them process the cam follower rollers, pins and needles. I figure this'll be a really good test of the Microblue process given the lack of an oil pump in this engine and a few of these are common trouble spots.
Well, it's now time to put the engine together (now that I've saved up some funds from kicking the beer and firecrackers habit) and, once again, I'm in contact with Thumper Racing to do the work.
Going to have them install larger valves in the head along with a little runner porting, port the combustion chamber for a reasonable compression ratio, bore the carb, balance the crank, and perform most of the final assembly.
...aaaannd I finally get to the point of my post. In talking with Travis, he is recommending a 58% balance factor. Since this engine is destined to reside in a 1996 chassis, does this balance factor sound reasonable? I've heard of balance factors between 60% and 80% being used in the newer '00-'08 chassis and my hope is that the '96 frame is similar enough to warrant an equally similar BF. What say you, the collective engine building geniuses.