CodeMonkey said:I run 'soft' on the trail and 'aggressive' on the pavement. A noticeable difference, mostly in how quick the power is delivered, but also a bit in amount, especially with more throttle and RPMs. It would be interesting to see dyno runs on the three different settings.
I have had no problems on any of the settings. Others have said that the 'aggressive' setting gives the best fuel mileage.
From what I have been told, the mapping settings change the ignition mapping, not the fuel mapping, so you are retarding the igniton? If that is the case then it isn't surprising that fuel mileage suffers on the 'soft' or 'standard' setting as compared to the 'aggressive'.Taffy said:CodeMonkey said:I run 'soft' on the trail and 'aggressive' on the pavement. A noticeable difference, mostly in how quick the power is delivered, but also a bit in amount, especially with more throttle and RPMs. It would be interesting to see dyno runs on the three different settings.
I have had no problems on any of the settings. Others have said that the 'aggressive' setting gives the best fuel mileage.
talking out of my a... maybe but if you reduce the power by using the ignition you make the bike very inefficient so i find the reasoning very plausible.
regards
Taffy