Husaberg
Go Back   Husaberg Forum > Mechanical and Technical > Suspension

Suspension Suspension and Handling Forum - bouncy bouncy!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
June 9th, 2010, 11:15 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
From: Outback, Australia

Posts: 17
Thanks: 0

I Ride:
Thoughts on CC forks in 2011 FE Bergs??

Hi all,

Might be looking at upgrading to a new berg in a few months and wondering what peoples thoughts are on the new FE's having CC forks now?

Will it be a decent positive step compared to last years OC forks? I have very limited experience of WP CC forks so just after a little info.

thanks
spiderpig is offline  
 
June 10th, 2010, 03:42 AM   #2
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
From: Bulgaria

Posts: 61
Thanks: 0

I Ride:
Re: Thoughts on CC forks in 2011 FE Bergs??

I would say YES! Esp. for any speed above 30 km/h!!!
suhoi27 is offline  
June 10th, 2010, 04:10 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
berglsmerg's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2009
From: Charters Towers, Australia

Posts: 901
Thanks: 27

I Ride: FE 610 oh yea
Re: Thoughts on CC forks in 2011 FE Bergs??

Could anyone enlighten me on what the difference between the two is ? I've been getting pretty confident on the old girl lately and am thinking I should put some time/effort/cash into the suspension setup. Would 46 front springs and 76 shock spring need a revalve ? Or would this closed chamber setup be more benefical to a geared up 195lb z grader ?
berglsmerg is offline  
June 10th, 2010, 08:20 AM   #4
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2002
From: Sunland, CA

Posts: 3,109
Thanks: 1

I Ride:
Re: Thoughts on CC forks in 2011 FE Bergs??

My two cents on the CC forks,

Keep in mind I have not personally tested them, but, what I do have is a lot of exposure to people who have them.

Yes, the off road pro riders are using them on their bikes, but, unless I am mistaken they are the 50mm Aluminun slider ultra trick works units. Just have a look at the axle stub clamps on the regular CC and open cartridge forks compared to the axle clamping stubs on the factory bikes.

I have to say that I am disappointed that all the FE's are allegedly coming with the CC forks. UNLESS, there has been some design changes. They are a good choice for the FX and it's intended use, but, for off road use the open cartridge design is better for off road.

Basically, the WP CC forks are good for MX, SX, WORCS, and really aggressive riders. The open cartridge forks are better at eating up trail hack, rocks, roots etc..... I personally am a little bewildered at why the company would go to this type of fork.

A guess.........Husaberg got a lot of flack for the suspension supposedly being unbalanced in a lot of magazine write ups. The root cause for this was the bike came under sprung to begin with, TRUE, and the valving package was not the best either, also TRUE.

Several magazines put the CC forks from KTM bikes on the Husaberg's in an attempt to improve the handling, with out upping the rear spring rate, or changing the valving-in a word STUPID.

So Husaberg, instead of just upping the spring rates one notch, and maybe doing a little valving work, they replaced a good working off road fork with a MX fork that has a known design problem. I'm not going to go into any detail on that, as I am working on something for this site concerning suspension that will knock your socks off.

Sorry to be down on the bikes on this subject, but, I know what I know about the CC forks. I don't think it's a reason to not buy the bike, but, it's not a move in the right direction by Husaberg for the majority of off road riders that ride these bikes.
DaleEO is offline  
June 10th, 2010, 09:23 AM   #5
 
Joined: Mar 2010
From:

Posts: 94
Thanks: 0

I Ride:
Re: Thoughts on CC forks in 2011 FE Bergs??

Originally Posted by DaleEO
My two cents on the CC forks,

Keep in mind I have not personally tested them, but, what I do have is a lot of exposure to people who have them.

Yes, the off road pro riders are using them on their bikes, but, unless I am mistaken they are the 50mm Aluminun slider ultra trick works units. Just have a look at the axle stub clamps on the regular CC and open cartridge forks compared to the axle clamping stubs on the factory bikes.

I have to say that I am disappointed that all the FE's are allegedly coming with the CC forks. UNLESS, there has been some design changes. They are a good choice for the FX and it's intended use, but, for off road use the open cartridge design is better for off road.

Basically, the WP CC forks are good for MX, SX, WORCS, and really aggressive riders. The open cartridge forks are better at eating up trail hack, rocks, roots etc..... I personally am a little bewildered at why the company would go to this type of fork.

A guess.........Husaberg got a lot of flack for the suspension supposedly being unbalanced in a lot of magazine write ups. The root cause for this was the bike came under sprung to begin with, TRUE, and the valving package was not the best either, also TRUE.

Several magazines put the CC forks from KTM bikes on the Husaberg's in an attempt to improve the handling, with out upping the rear spring rate, or changing the valving-in a word STUPID.

So Husaberg, instead of just upping the spring rates one notch, and maybe doing a little valving work, they replaced a good working off road fork with a MX fork that has a known design problem. I'm not going to go into any detail on that, as I am working on something for this site concerning suspension that will knock your socks off.

Sorry to be down on the bikes on this subject, but, I know what I know about the CC forks. I don't think it's a reason to not buy the bike, but, it's not a move in the right direction by Husaberg for the majority of off road riders that ride these bikes.
It's a preference thing. I would be willing to trade the OC forks off my Husaberg TODAY for a set of CC forks. The OC forks are plush, but for what I ride and my style I prefer the firmer CC ride and bottoming resistance.
Serpexc is offline  
June 10th, 2010, 10:24 AM   #6
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2002
From: Sunland, CA

Posts: 3,109
Thanks: 1

I Ride:
Re: Thoughts on CC forks in 2011 FE Bergs??

Originally Posted by Serpexc
Originally Posted by DaleEO
My two cents on the CC forks,

Keep in mind I have not personally tested them, but, what I do have is a lot of exposure to people who have them.

Yes, the off road pro riders are using them on their bikes, but, unless I am mistaken they are the 50mm Aluminun slider ultra trick works units. Just have a look at the axle stub clamps on the regular CC and open cartridge forks compared to the axle clamping stubs on the factory bikes.

I have to say that I am disappointed that all the FE's are allegedly coming with the CC forks. UNLESS, there has been some design changes. They are a good choice for the FX and it's intended use, but, for off road use the open cartridge design is better for off road.

Basically, the WP CC forks are good for MX, SX, WORCS, and really aggressive riders. The open cartridge forks are better at eating up trail hack, rocks, roots etc..... I personally am a little bewildered at why the company would go to this type of fork.

A guess.........Husaberg got a lot of flack for the suspension supposedly being unbalanced in a lot of magazine write ups. The root cause for this was the bike came under sprung to begin with, TRUE, and the valving package was not the best either, also TRUE.

Several magazines put the CC forks from KTM bikes on the Husaberg's in an attempt to improve the handling, with out upping the rear spring rate, or changing the valving-in a word STUPID.

So Husaberg, instead of just upping the spring rates one notch, and maybe doing a little valving work, they replaced a good working off road fork with a MX fork that has a known design problem. I'm not going to go into any detail on that, as I am working on something for this site concerning suspension that will knock your socks off.

Sorry to be down on the bikes on this subject, but, I know what I know about the CC forks. I don't think it's a reason to not buy the bike, but, it's not a move in the right direction by Husaberg for the majority of off road riders that ride these bikes.
It's a preference thing. I would be willing to trade the OC forks off my Husaberg TODAY for a set of CC forks. The OC forks are plush, but for what I ride and my style I prefer the firmer CC ride and bottoming resistance.[/quote

Serpexc, I know you have written about what you have done in other forums, but, cannot recall at the moment what you have done other than upping the spring rates, did you revalve your stock forks?
DaleEO is offline  
June 10th, 2010, 10:41 AM   #7
 
Joined: Mar 2010
From:

Posts: 94
Thanks: 0

I Ride:
Re: Thoughts on CC forks in 2011 FE Bergs??

Originally Posted by DaleEO
Originally Posted by Serpexc
Originally Posted by DaleEO
My two cents on the CC forks,

Keep in mind I have not personally tested them, but, what I do have is a lot of exposure to people who have them.

Yes, the off road pro riders are using them on their bikes, but, unless I am mistaken they are the 50mm Aluminun slider ultra trick works units. Just have a look at the axle stub clamps on the regular CC and open cartridge forks compared to the axle clamping stubs on the factory bikes.

I have to say that I am disappointed that all the FE's are allegedly coming with the CC forks. UNLESS, there has been some design changes. They are a good choice for the FX and it's intended use, but, for off road use the open cartridge design is better for off road.

Basically, the WP CC forks are good for MX, SX, WORCS, and really aggressive riders. The open cartridge forks are better at eating up trail hack, rocks, roots etc..... I personally am a little bewildered at why the company would go to this type of fork.

A guess.........Husaberg got a lot of flack for the suspension supposedly being unbalanced in a lot of magazine write ups. The root cause for this was the bike came under sprung to begin with, TRUE, and the valving package was not the best either, also TRUE.

Several magazines put the CC forks from KTM bikes on the Husaberg's in an attempt to improve the handling, with out upping the rear spring rate, or changing the valving-in a word STUPID.

So Husaberg, instead of just upping the spring rates one notch, and maybe doing a little valving work, they replaced a good working off road fork with a MX fork that has a known design problem. I'm not going to go into any detail on that, as I am working on something for this site concerning suspension that will knock your socks off.

Sorry to be down on the bikes on this subject, but, I know what I know about the CC forks. I don't think it's a reason to not buy the bike, but, it's not a move in the right direction by Husaberg for the majority of off road riders that ride these bikes.
It's a preference thing. I would be willing to trade the OC forks off my Husaberg TODAY for a set of CC forks. The OC forks are plush, but for what I ride and my style I prefer the firmer CC ride and bottoming resistance.[/quote

Serpexc, I know you have written about what you have done in other forums, but, cannot recall at the moment what you have done other than upping the spring rates, did you revalve your stock forks?
Yes, Javier at Trail Tricks did his high end mods and revalving on both ends. The forks are really plush, but I still prefer the overall action of the CC forks. I'm still playing with the overall set up of the bike too. I was riding a 2008 300xc and a 505xc with Trail Tricks suspension before. I guess I got used to the CC forks on those two bikes and don't want to go back. It was easier to move from one KTM to the next because my suspension settings didn't change that much, but moving to the Berg has required a lot more suspension testing and might very well require a change to my riding style.
Serpexc is offline  
June 10th, 2010, 10:46 AM   #8
 
Joined: Mar 2010
From:

Posts: 94
Thanks: 0

I Ride:
Re: Thoughts on CC forks in 2011 FE Bergs??

I installed a pair of borrowed CC forks on to the 570 this morning. They are also revalved and modded by Trail Tricks, but set up for a slightly heavier rider on a big KTM four stroke . I''ll post my finding after my ride tomorrow. I think the will be set up pretty close to what I would want to run. I'm hoping that they will work awesome.
Serpexc is offline  
June 10th, 2010, 12:06 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
VIKING's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
From: Sandpoint ID

Posts: 378
Thanks: 0

I Ride:
Re: Thoughts on CC forks in 2011 FE Bergs??

I think that CC forks are an improvement over OC fork allthough I have not tested yhe FX forks so dont know
how they work good or bad I have set of CC forks on my berg and they are more consistant compared to the OC
fork, one negative on the WP CC forks is that they have bladder thats makes them feel more topped out and little
less pebble compliant compared to OC forks and jap CC forks with cartridge spring

later VIKING
VIKING is offline  
June 10th, 2010, 01:00 PM   #10
 
Joined: Dec 2009
From: St. Paul MN

Posts: 199
Thanks: 0

I Ride:
Re: Thoughts on CC forks in 2011 FE Bergs??

What does this mean if you are a lightweight 135 pounder gal and are considering a new Berg? I know I'll have to revalve and respring front & back but will it be more expensive with CC forks? Maybe I should stick with my 08 Berg that's I had set up by Factory Connection...but I'm craving the fuel injection and new motor!
LadyBerg is offline  
Reply

  Husaberg Forum > Mechanical and Technical > Suspension

Tags
2011, bergs, forks, thoughts


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Closed forks on 2011 FE570 harsh Rensho Suspension 4 September 17th, 2012 03:25 PM
Thoughts on the 2011 FE 570 S Barshoe Husaberg 10 March 27th, 2012 10:51 AM
Need help with re-mounting forks/brakes 2011 FE 570 BlueDevil Suspension 2 September 24th, 2011 03:00 PM
2011 BERGS IN STOCK! ALL PRE 2011 ON CLEARANCE SALE! renoktm Marketplace 0 September 18th, 2010 12:22 PM
Mod to improve the life of forks seals 09/10 bergs bowser Suspension 5 January 22nd, 2010 04:27 PM


Facebook Twitter Google+ RSS Feed